Skip to main content

Stop talking to your car: Voice-activated systems shown to distract drivers

car voice activated systems cause distractions audi a7 autonomous hands free driving 1500x1000
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Cars don’t make for very good conversationalists, so you probably shouldn’t be talking to them while you’re driving. In fact, they’re so poor as conversationalists go that a new study suggests the voice-activated systems that many vehicles tout as your smart interaction system are distracting drivers from the road, and potentially causing accidents in the meantime. According to Thursday’s results from the American Automobile Association, the “mental workload” associated with talking to your car is “surprisingly high,” significantly more so than talking to an actual human being, and about as high sending a text or an email.

While voice-activated systems are heralded by several companies as the safe alternative to interacting with your smartphone while on the road, the latest research suggests that this is far from accurate. With some of the most complicated systems, like those found in the Mazda 6, the Hyundai Sonata, or the Chrysler 200C, drivers remained distracted for up to 27 seconds after they ended their conversations with their cars. Even less complex systems resulted in long-tail attention deficits of up to 15 seconds — not great for reacting to sudden changes or dangerous roadway conditions.

1-upto27second
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The study, which involved 257 drivers, ages 21 to 70, used 10 different 2015 model cars to “assess cognitive workload” of the drivers in the vehicles. All participants were given five days to practice and familiarize themselves with the cars and their voice systems before being tested on the resulting effects of their car interactions on their driving. Ultimately, says AAA Chief Executive Peter Kissinger, “the lasting effects of mental distraction pose a hidden and pervasive danger that would likely come as a surprise to most drivers.”

Recommended Videos

David Strayer, a neuroscientist at the University of Utah who led the research, compared controlling a car’s “smart” system to “balancing a checkbook while driving.”

“When you hang up, you have to figure out where you are, how fast you’re going, where other vehicles are,” he explained. And this mental recalibration not only takes time, but is potentially dangerous to do mid-road.

And it’s not just the systems in your car that are proving to be problematic — the research also suggests that smartphone systems like Microsoft’s Cortana, Apple’s Siri, and Google Now are distracting for drivers, so just because you’re hands-free doesn’t mean you’re mind-free too. The concern, researchers note, is that “with the explosive growth in technology, the problem of driver distraction is poised to become much more acute.”

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra forge a new path for EVs
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra.

Electric vehicles are inseparable from newness, whether it’s new tech, new designs, or new companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Tesla. But the Volkswagen Group’s new EV-only brand also relies heavily on the past.

Unveiled Thursday, the Scout Traveler electric SUV and Scout Terra electric pickup truck are modern interpretations of the classic International Harvester Scout. Manufactured from 1961 to 1980, the original Scout helped popularize the idea of the rugged, off-road-capable utility vehicle, setting the stage for modern SUVs.

Read more
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more