Skip to main content

Collision-avoidance technology may mean accident-proof cars

collision avoidance technology may become standard in cars regera megacar interior b
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Defensive driving may soon be getting an automated boost if the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) gets its way. In a report released on Monday, the federal agency recommended that collision-avoidance technology be implemented in all vehicles, potentially saving thousands of lives every year. While the technology has been around for a few years now, the feature does not come standard on most passenger and commercial automobiles, but that may soon change.

Each year, the agency pointed out in its 60-page report, around 1,700 people are killed in rear-end collisions, and half a million more are injured. But many of these deaths and injuries — around 80 percent, in fact — are avoidable with existing technologies that can either alert the driver to dangerous situations, or redirect the vehicle in a safe way to avoid an accident. Some systems would automatically apply brakes, while others would steer the car in a slightly different direction, but all (ostensibly) with the same result — keeping drivers and passengers safe.

Recommended Videos

These systems have been in the works for the past two decades, but continuous debate has prevented their full implementation and standardization across the industry. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, for one, believes that drivers should have the option to choose what sorts of features they want in their cars, though as some have pointed out, the same argument once applied to seat belts and airbags, which are both now standard safety features.

Christopher Hart, the NTSB chairman, said in a statement, “You don’t pay extra for your seat belt, and you shouldn’t have to pay extra for technology that can help prevent a collision altogether.” Still, some critics say that the automotive industry should hold out for more advanced future developments, as technology continues to become increasingly innovative. But this constant procrastination is dangerous, says the NTSB.

“The promise of a next generation of safety improvements has been used too often to justify inaction,” Hart noted. “Because there will always be better technologies over the horizon, we must be careful to avoid letting perfection become the enemy of the good.”

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more