Skip to main content

Eye-tracking goggles reveal how F1 drivers ‘see’ the track

Eye Tracking on an F1 car
Tootling along in your car, of course you go through all your maneuvers without giving too much attention to what you’re doing. Checking mirrors, hitting turn signals, scratching itches – it’s all pretty much automatic for most drivers.

However, curious about how highly skilled professional drivers deal with fast-changing track conditions, Sky Sports recently teamed up with F1 driver Nico Hulkenberg and his Force India racing team for a little experiment.

Recommended Videos

Using eye-tracking technology from Tobii, Sky fitted Nico with a pair of smart goggles featuring five tiny infra-red cameras capable of detecting and showing eye movement. Besides offering an accurate view of precisely where the F1 driver looked as he motored around a racing circuit, the collected data also showed Nico’s reaction times to events on the track.

Busy eyes

After analysing the driving data, Sky said the “big surprise” is just how busy the eyes are during high-speed driving. The human eye’s relatively small focal point “makes for a pretty lousy camera,” though the brain’s phenomenal processing skills allow pro drivers to make sense of the rapidly changing situation in the road ahead.

F1 drivers have trained their brain to speed up eye movements between focal points and understand new information more quickly, enabling them to take in and process more information than non-pro drivers, Sky explained.

The video above shows Nico roaring out of a pit lane and checking his mirror in just a tenth of a second, “approaching the shortest amount of time a human can look at something” while processing the related information. Regular drivers typically need at least half a second to do the same thing, according to Sky.

Check out the video for further examples of how Nico deals with other challenges on the track, including taking bends and coming into the pits.

“When you consider all of this, it’s understandable why the likes of Nico Hulkenberg seem relaxed and calm out of the car,” the video’s presenter says. “While they might seem like chilled-out sportsmen, what they’re really doing is saving mental energy for what really matters when the visor comes down on a Sunday afternoon.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more