‘Roll-away’ feature not on option list, Fiat Chrysler recalls 1.1 million vehicles

By Bruce Brown April 23, 2016

2014-Jeep-Grand-Cherokee-SRT-right — Fiat Chrysler has issued a recall of 1.1 million vehicles because of rollaways Image used with permission by copyright holder

When parking your car, be sure you really put it in PARK! Enough people were apparently confused by the automatic gearshift designs on some 2012-2015 Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep cars and SUVs that Fiat Chrysler has just issued a recall of 1.1 million vehicles that could roll away, according to a BBC report.

The recall is for 850,000 vehicles sold in the U.S. and 250,000 sold in other countries. The specific models are 2012-2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 sedans, and 2014-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs. The shift indicator design has since been designed for use in all models. Fiat Chrysler updated the Charger and Chrysler 300 gearshift design for the 2015 models and the Jeep Grand Cherokee for the 2016 model year.

Recommended Videos

Usually occurring soon after purchase, the rollaways happened after drivers thought they had put the transmission in Park and got out of the cars. The result was 314 complaints to the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by February. The confusion was the apparent cause of 121 crashes and 41 injuries, including three broken pelvises. In some incidents, the rolling cars hit drivers, other vehicles, and buildings.

While no date has been set for the fix availability, Fiat Chrysler stated they will update the recalled vehicles so they will not roll away, even if owners don’t put the transmission in Park. The NHSTA said it was on it and will watch to be sure Fiat Chrysler fixes the problem in a timely fashion.

There was no statement as to whether the drivers had activated the emergency brake after thinking they’d put the cars in Park. I found disagreement when I did a quick internet check of experts’ opinions about the necessity of emergency brakes when parking, especially on flat ground. If drivers were in the habit of using the emergency brake, however, it’s a good bet the recalled Fiat Chrysler vehicles wouldn’t have rolled. If you have one of the cars on the list, take them in for a fix in a timely manner. Even if you have no issue with the gearshift design personally, selling your unfixed car to someone down the line might end in an unfortunate rollaway.

Topics

Contributing Editor

Bruce Brown Contributing Editor As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.