Skip to main content

Ford’s plan to go carbon neutral by 2050 is big on promises, light on details

Ford announced this week that it aspires to be carbon neutral by 2050. It’s an admirable goal, but actually reaching it will require fundamental changes to the car company’s business — including cutting emissions from its factories, from its suppliers, and from the vehicles it manufactures — and some experts want Ford to spell out its interim steps more clearly.

While details on Ford’s plan are scarce, one thing that is clear is that the automaker’s vehicles make up the biggest piece of the sustainability puzzle. They generate 135 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, according to Fords most recent sustainability report. That’s 36 times the amount of its facilities’ greenhouse gas emissions.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Automakers haven’t always addressed their vehicles’ emissions in sustainability reports, Dr. David Cooke, senior vehicles analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Digital Trends. “The majority of the emissions coming from these companies is actually through the use of the vehicles they sell,” he said. “So that’s really that’s an important point that I think has definitely not been true in the industry, broadly.”  

Recommended Videos

Last year, Daimler committed to becoming carbon neutral by 2039, and Jason Mathers, director of vehicles and freight strategy at the Environmental Defense Fund, hopes Ford’s efforts inspire more car companies to make similar moves. “Part of the importance here is that Ford is setting a standard for the rest of the industry, and the rest of the industry now needs to catch up and meet this level of performance from an environmental perspective,” he said.

“They’re pushing F-150s out right and left. You can’t just offset that with 40,000 Mach Es.”

Earlier this year, Ford said a third of its vehicles will be electric by 2030. It also planned to invest $11 billion in electric vehicles between 2018 and 2022. Yet the sustainability report didn’t offer specifics on how it will electrify its fleet between now and 2050. Just two years ago, Ford said it would turn the majority of its focus from sedans to SUVs and trucks, which use more fuel. Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign, said Ford can’t afford to wait if it’s serious about its goals. “Carbon dioxide is a cumulative pollutant,” he said. “The sooner it’s emitted, the bigger the problem.”

Thirty-seven percent of the 2.4 million vehicles Ford sold last year were F-150 pickup trucks. Most models get around 18-20 miles per gallon. Meanwhile, in the same year, Ford only sold 7,476 of its Fusion Energi hybrid, according to the United States Department of Energy. Ford is planning on announcing a hybrid F-150 this week, but it’s still expecting its traditional gas and diesel pickups to make up the majority sales for the foreseeable future, according to CNBC.

“They’re pushing F-150s out right and left. You can’t just offset that with 40,000 Mach Es,” Cooke said, referring to Ford’s upcoming $43,895 electric Mustang.

2019 Ford F-150 Raptor
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Becker wants to see a deeper shift in Ford’s culture, including its marketing. “They spend billions of dollars a year trying to convince people who don’t really need a pickup truck that they really need a pickup truck,” he said. “And most people who buy pickup trucks today only use them for hauling a latte home from Starbucks.”

Ford’s aspirations come after former CEO Mark Fields supported a rollback of the Obama administration’s fuel economy standards. In 2019, Ford, along with Volkswagen, Honda, and BMW, struck a deal with California to increase the average fuel economy in their vehicles by 3.7%. That doesn’t measure up to the Obama-era targets of requiring automakers to average 54.5 miles per gallon across their vehicle fleets by 2025.

“Do you give them credit for not being as bad as some of their competitors when they still did whatever they could to ensure that it wasn’t as strong as what’s actually, technically feasible, and what’s needed from a climate perspective?” Cooke asked.

Jenny McGrath
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Jenny McGrath is a senior writer at Digital Trends covering the intersection of tech and the arts and the environment. Before…
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra forge a new path for EVs
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra.

Electric vehicles are inseparable from newness, whether it’s new tech, new designs, or new companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Tesla. But the Volkswagen Group’s new EV-only brand also relies heavily on the past.

Unveiled Thursday, the Scout Traveler electric SUV and Scout Terra electric pickup truck are modern interpretations of the classic International Harvester Scout. Manufactured from 1961 to 1980, the original Scout helped popularize the idea of the rugged, off-road-capable utility vehicle, setting the stage for modern SUVs.

Read more
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more