Skip to main content

Ford, Honda, BMW, and Volkswagen reach deal with California on emissions

Image used with permission by copyright holder

One of the biggest unknowns in U.S. environmental policy has been how the administration of President Donald Trump would react to California’s ability to set its own stricter emissions standards — something that goes against the administration’s policy of laxer government regulations. The story took a new turn Thursday, July 26, with the announcement that four major automakers — Ford, Honda, BMW, and Volkswagen — had cut a deal with California on emissions.

The agreement constitutes an acknowledgment by the four automakers of California’s right to set its own emissions standards, putting them at odds with a White House that has indicated it wants to strip the state of that right and roll back Obama-era emissions standards.

Recommended Videos

“Ensuring that America’s vehicles are efficient, safe, and affordable is a priority for us all,” the four automakers said in a joint statement. The agreement with California is voluntary and not legally binding, but the automakers said they hoped it could help maintain a national set of emissions standards and curtail continued conflict between the federal and state governments.

The four automakers “didn’t want to face the expense, distraction, and the bad publicity that comes from being part of a big rollback on clean cars,” Mary Nichols, who chairs the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the agency which sets the state’s emissions regulations, said in an interview with Reuters. Because of the long lead times involved in developing and launching new cars, automakers seek regulatory certainty above all else. Stricter regulations that are locked in for the long term are preferable to an abrupt shift to looser regulations.

The White House told Reuters that “the federal government, not a single state, should set this standard.” In a statement to Reuters, Environmental Protection Agency spokesperson Michael Abboud called the agreement between California and the automakers a “PR stunt.”

The agreement is less strict than the Obama-era rules, but tougher than standards proposed by the Trump Administration. Rules adopted in 2012 call for average fuel efficiency of 46.7 mpg by 2025, with average annual increases of about 5%. The Trump Administration has proposed freezing fuel-economy standards at 2020 levels through 2026, which would yield a fleetwide average of 37 mpg by the final year.

Under the agreement between California and the four automakers, the average fuel economy would increase by 3.7% annually between model years 2022 and 2026. But 1% of that annual increase could be covered by credits awarded for building hybrid, battery-electric, and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. The agreement would also raise the cap for credits for fuel-economy improvements that don’t register in traditional testing, and would remove a requirement to account for “upstream” emissions, according to Reuters.

Automakers want to see the fighting between California and the federal government over emissions standards end. In June, 17 automakers sent a letter to Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom asking to revive talks over emissions regulations. Prolonged uncertainty would be a nightmare for automakers, as it would limit their ability to make future plans.

States currently have the option to follow federal emissions rules or California’s stricter rules, with 12 states having opted for the latter. They will likely follow California’s lead in accepting the compromise with Ford, Honda, BMW, and VW — or any other automakers that sign on.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Volvo’s much-anticipated EX30 EV to reach U.S. before year end
Front three quarter view of the 2025 Volvo EX30.

Volvo is switching gears again, this time to accelerate deliveries of its much-anticipated EX30 subcompact electric SUV so that it reaches the U.S. before the end of 2024.

The Swedish automaker last summer had postponed the U.S. launch of the EX30 to 2025, citing “changes in the global automotive landscape." The move followed the Biden administration’s 100% import tariff on electric vehicles made in China.

Read more
Rivian R2 EV’s new LG battery boosts storage capacity sixfold
Rivian R2

The Rivian R2, the EV maker’s much-anticipated affordable electric SUV, will be powered by U.S.-made batteries promising to store six times as much energy as those currently used.

South Korea’s LG Energy Solutions announced it will be supplying LG’s 4695 cylindrical batteries to Rivian as part of a five-year agreement.

Read more
Scout Terra vs. Tesla Cybertruck: retro and futuristic, head to head
Scout Motors Terra driving front

Scout Motors is back. The classic brand has been reinvigorated under Volkswagen Group, and not only that, but it has already announced two new vehicles that it plans to launch in the next few years. Of the two, the Scout Terra is the electric truck, and it's built to offer a modern design with an excellent range and fast performance.

But how does the Scout Terra compare with another popular electric truck, the Tesla Cybertruck? While the Scout Terra is set to be much cheaper than the Cybertruck is now, it's entirely possible that by the time the Terra is released, it could have a higher price tag than expected, while Tesla lowers the price tag of the Cybertruck. Is one of these trucks objectively better? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The Scout Terra and the Tesla Cybertruck arguably couldn't be further apart in terms of design. Of course, variation is a good thing, at least as long as both options are solid under the hood too.

Read more