Ford turns shipping containers into a mobile wind tunnel for vehicle testing

By Stephen Edelstein May 3, 2016

Ford mobile wind tunnel — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Wind tunnels are crucial to understanding the intricate details of aerodynamics. Airflow affects everything from fuel economy to cabin noise, and wind tunnels let engineers analyze it in detail. Yet while they’re incredibly useful, wind tunnels are also big and expensive.

Ford is changing that, though. The carmaker figured out how to build a mobile wind tunnel out of shipping containers that can operate at a fraction of the cost of a conventional setup. It was built specifically to test for unwanted wind noise in early-production vehicles. The cars are pulled off the assembly line and tested onsite, which Ford hopes will shorten the amount of time needed to identify problems and implement fixes.

Recommended Videos

Compared to Ford’s main wind tunnel in Allen Park, Michigan, which is the size of an office building and cost $50 million to build, the mobile wind tunnel is a bit more primitive. It consists of two 53-foot-long shipping containers that can be trucked wherever they’re needed. Two six-foot-diameter fans powered by 250-horsepower electric motors can generate winds of up to 80 mph.

Read more: How Ford plans to take its Michigan headquarters into the future

The two containers are fastened together side by side on a flat section of pavement. A third, 40-foot container serves as an officer and control booth. Despite using 100-foot power-distribution cables that weigh 1,080 pounds each (including 40-pound plugs), Ford says the entire assembly can be broken down within a day, and reassembled at a new site “within hours.”

In-car sensors, like a noise-detecting dummy called an “Aachen head,” are used to check newly-assembled vehicles for issues. Doing that work at a factory eliminates the need to ship cars across the country to traditional facilities, and allows for quicker fixes since all of the relevant people are in one place, Ford says. The mobile wind tunnel also frees up Ford’s Allen Park tunnel for more in-depth work, like new-vehicle development.

The mobile wind tunnel will be put into operation at Ford’s Flat Rock Assembly Plant in Michigan, which builds the Mustang and Fusion. Ford has other mobile test facilities as well, including three environmental evaluation chambers.

Topics

Stephen Edelstein

Contributing Editor

Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.