Skip to main content

To protect drivers, F1 wants to give cars ‘Halos’

2015 Red Bull RB11 Formula One car
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The deaths of Jules Bianchi and IndyCar driver Justin Wilson have led Formula One to consider a major rethink of racecar safety. Concerns over driver head injuries could push F1 to add canopies or screens to its open-topped cars for the first time ever.

Officials are considering a canopy design known as the “Halo” as part of sweeping changes to car-design rules set to take effect in 2017, according to Motorsport. The canopy wouldn’t fully enclose a car’s cockpit, but it would provide significant protection from airborne debris, advocates say.

Recommended Videos

Some form of “Halo” has already been mandated for the 2017 season, the report says, but the design hasn’t been finalized. It will most likely have a semi-circular piece surrounding the driver’s head (hence the name “Halo”), with an upright piece in front of the driver to support it. Debate now seems to center on whether the structure should be enclosed around the front with some kind of clear material, or left open.

Seemingly small details like this can ignite big arguments among F1’s teams and officials, and in fact the windscreen won’t be ready for 2017. The matter will be further discussed at an upcoming Technical Regulations Meeting, and teams want to test the windscreen concept to make sure it provides a real benefit. The Halo itself is a go, though.

The death of Justin Wilson from head injuries sustained during a collision with another during an IndyCar race last year have intensified calls for greater driver protection. But the use of closed cockpits in F1 has been criticized because of other potential safety issues. There have been concerns that drivers may not be able to get out of cars fast enough in emergencies, or that rescue workers may waste too much time removing canopies.

First proposed by Mercedes-Benz, the Halo is supposed to address those concerns with its open-topped design. It won’t be the only significant change on the F1 grid for 2017. New rules are expected to affect everything from aerodynamics to engine performance, in an effort to make F1 cars faster, and generally more exciting.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more