Skip to main content

Godsil’s Manhattan supercoupe is the mutant offspring of a Maybach and a Morgan

Can one of the most luxurious cars on the planet come out of Washington state? Godsil Motorcars certainly thinks so, and it’s hoping to prove its point by building an extravagant coupe named Manhattan.

This isn’t the whiskey-based Manhattan you order in a fancy hotel bar. It’s an extra-long, head-turning coupe that makes the Rolls-Royce Wraith look modest and restrained. It answers the question, “what would a Duesenberg look like today if the company was still in business?”

Recommended Videos

It turns out, a modern-day Duesenberg would borrow styling cues from the Art Deco style of the 1920s and ’30s without going full retro. The end result is like the mutant love child of a Morgan 4/4 and the one-off Maybach Exerelo, conceived behind a Rolls-Royce dealership after a few too many Manhattans. It boasts understated stainless steel accents, wide vents in the front fenders, and a shapely boat-tail rear end.

Godsil wanted to really make a statement, so it couldn’t settle for buying a V8 engine from Chevrolet or Ford. That would be a little too mundane, don’t you think? Instead, it took the eye-wateringly expensive route of developing its own engine with input from engineer Stephen Chue. Technical specifications haven’t been finalized yet, but power for the Manhattan will come from a V16 engine with a displacement of about 13 liter and an output of roughly 1,000 horsepower.

If everything goes according to plan, the Manhattan will become the first production car to use a V16 engine since 1940. And, let’s make this clear before you send us hate mail: The Bugatti Chiron uses a W16, not a V16. Unlike other 16-cylinder engines, the Manhattan’s runs on natural gas. The decision was made for ecological and patriotic reasons.

“Natural gas is about 33 percent cleaner than gasoline and produces similar horsepower, torque and fuel mileage,” explained company founder Jason Godsil. Also, it’s “America’s fuel, which means if it can get into the mainstream of vehicle use, America can stop buying oil from countries that don’t like us much,” he added.

The big question is: What’s next? In a long press release, Godsil explains it tried scoring grants from 48 states, and it attempted to secure part of Volkswagen’s massive settlement fund, but it failed both times. The Department of Energy wasn’t willing to help, either, and venture capital companies refused to invest money into the project — yikes.

The company told Digital Trends it’s currently funding the project and doing a lot of the work on its own, but it needs investors to take the the Manhattan to the next level. Once it obtains the financing it needs, it will take about a year to assemble the first prototype, and anywhere between three to five years to build the first regular-production car. Pricing is tentatively set to start in the vicinity of $650,000.

Ultimately, Godsil plans on launching a full lineup of ultra-luxurious, V16-powered cars. The family will include a four-door sedan, a SUV, and even a midengined supercar. It all sounds intriguing, but the first and most important step is getting the Manhattan project off the ground.

Updated by Ronan Glon: Added official information about Manhattan’s launch schedule and price.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more