Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Google’s Waze Rider rideshare program ends testing phase, goes live in SF

Waze Carpool
Waze Rider casual carpooling is now available for all Waze users in the San Francisco area. After months of testing its rideshare concept with the employees of select tech companies, the service is open to all, as reported by Engadget.
Recommended Videos

Waze Rider differs from Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare programs in several respects. Any Waze mapping app user can sign up to be a driver or rider. Drivers aren’t screened or subject to background checks. Drivers also won’t make a lot of money because they’re limited to just two rides a day — in concept that means drivers give someone else a ride on their own way to and from work.

When Waze Rider drivers register they are asked for their home and work addresses and their general schedule. That information is used to match the driver with a prospective rider going in the same direction at approximately the same time of day.

The transaction is kept simple. There are no surge prices and drivers aren’t paid for their labor or their time — the only compensation they receive is $0.54 per mile, which matches the federal mileage reimbursement allowance.

So what it comes down to is this: commuters who are willing to pick up and drop off someone else who is going in the same general direction at the same time of day will have their own mileage expenses covered, based on the federal reimbursement rate. For a 20-mile commute for the rider, not the driver, Waze would reimburse the driver $10.80 (20 x $0.54).

Rider charges differ from driver payouts. In a recent test ride from San Francisco to Oakland, California, a Wall Street Journal reporter secured a Waze Rider trip. The driver was paid $6.30 for an almost 12-mile ride. The WSJ rider estimated the same ride would have cost $23-30 with Uber or Lyft during rush hour.

So Waze Rider drivers won’t get rich but they’ll have some of their vehicle expenses covered. Riders may pay less than with traditional rideshare companies.  Time will tell if this “casual” ridesharing service that’s not really a business will be a reliable mobility solution for people who don’t want to drive themselves to work.

Download for iOS Download for Android

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more