Skip to main content

Harman affirms that Fiat-Chrysler’s Uconnect is the only hackable infotainment system

Fiat Chrysler Uconnect
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Recent reports of a late-model Jeep Cherokee being hacked wirelessly by two researchers spread fear among American motorists and prompted a massive recall that affects 1.4 million cars. Harman, the company that manufactures the hacker-friendly Uconnect infotainment system, stresses that the other systems it provides to companies like Volvo, Mercedes-Benz parent company Daimler and BMW are secure and don’t suffer from the same vulnerabilities.

“We believe, based on our assessment with all other customers we supply our system to, that the Chrysler system is the only one exposed to this particular experimental hack. So it’s a unique situation,” affirmed company CEO Dinesh Paliwal during a conference call.

Recommended Videos

The executive acknowledged that hackers managed to take complete control of the Cherokee’s brakes, steering and engine by going into the infotainment system through the cell phone connection. “Once you get in, then you can mimic as if you are one of the authorized messengers, you start to send messages,” summed up Paliwal.

Harman says the Uconnect system that Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek hacked last month was designed about five years ago, and so it doesn’t boast the same safety features as the more modern systems that it provides to other automakers. To prevent future attacks, Fiat-Chrysler quickly designed a fix that it is sending to owners of affected cars on a USB drive.

The long list of vulnerable cars extends to 2013-2015 model year vehicles equipped with the 8.4-inch infotainment system. It includes the Dodge Viper, Durango, Challenger and Charger, several Ram pickups, Chrysler’s 200 and 300 and, of course, the Jeep Cherokee.

In spite of Harman’s attempt to reassure the auto industry, the National Highway Trafic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is taking a closer look at about 2.8 million cars, trucks and vans equipped with a Harman-designed infotainment system in order to ensure the issue exclusively affects Fiat-Chrysler products. The agency is worried that all of Harman’s infotainment systems could suffer from similar vulnerabilities, and it will summarize its findings in a report that will be published in the coming months.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more