Skip to main content

How VW milked 261 miles from a single gallon of gas with the record-breaking XL1

VOLKSWAGEN XL1: THE CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER GERMAN LAND DOLPHIN
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In the early 2000s, Dr. Professor Ferdinand Piëch – now Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Volkswagen AG – dreamed of a car that could achieve a fuel economy rating of one liter per 100 kilometers traveled. While some thought he was mad, it was this idea that spawned the project that would give rise to the XL1: the most fuel-efficient production car in the world.

The Car

The production XL1 represents the third generation of the highly fuel-efficient one-liter concept conceived by Piëch. In fact, the XL1 exceeds the fuel-efficiency goal by achieving 0.9 liters per 100 km or 261 miles per gallon. Achieving this goal took nearly twelve years and hundreds of thousands of man hours. In order to complete the daunting task, Volkswagen engineers had to develop dozens of new technologies both in drivetrain efficiencies and vehicle body construction.

vw xl1 body design
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The XL1 is built in a handcrafted-like method in Volkswagen’s Osnabrück plant in Germany. The dolphin-like two-seater, which is constructed from a revolutionary material called carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), is powered by a 0.8-liter two-cylinder TDI diesel plug-in hybrid system.

Recommended Videos

The Body

The ultra lightweight XL1 weighs only 1752 pounds and stands as the most aerodynamic production car in the world with a drag coefficient of 0.189. To put that in perspective, the Mercedes-Benz CLA, which is the next most aerodynamic production car, has a drag coefficient of 0.23. Intentionally, designers formed the XL1 to resemble a dolphin.

Volkswagen designers made sure the XL1 was not only very slippery while traveling through the air but also exceptionally striking to behold. Bodyline details were sculpted to be aerodynamic, efficient, and also aesthetically pleasing. To that end, Volkswagen installed wing doors on the XL1 to highlight its futuristic looks.

VOLKSWAGEN XL1 aerodynamic body futuristic doors
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Additionaly, Volkswagen replaced the standard side-view mirrors with digital video cameras – called E-Mirrors – mounted in the wing doors. The E-Mirrors send images to displays inside the cabin.

The Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) that comprises 21.3 percent of the XL1 is produced through a technique called resin transfer molding. The CFRP is formed in multi-shell, heated and cooled vacuum-sealed machinery. Liquid resin is injected at high pressure into the machine containing semi-finished carbon material. The result is CFRP.

…Capable of a 99 mile per hour top speed. It will go 0-62 mph in 12.7 seconds.

CFRP is used extensively throughout the XL1 including the bodywork but also the seats, and even the anti-roll bars. The exterior CFRP skin is only 1.2 mm thick. While exceptionally strong, CFRP weighs only 20 percent of what normal steel body panels weigh.

Two aluminum structures have been designed into the XL1, one in the front and one in the rear. The front aluminum skeleton cradles the 5.5-kilo-Watt-hour lithium-ion battery. In the rear, the aluminum structure holds the drivetrain and drive gear. These structures have been designed to absorb collision impact in the case of an accident, protecting the passengers. The XL1 offers passengers, as Volkswagen puts it, “necessary survival space.” 

Protecting passengers further, aluminum impact beams have been installed in each door. Should the XL1 roll over and land on its roof, engineers included pyrotechnic screws in the wing doors that will detonate, allowing for an easy exit.

VOLKSWAGEN XL1 aerodynamic body structure
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While able to comfortably seat two passengers, the XL1 is very petite. It’s only 12.7 feet long, 5.4 feet wide, and 3.7 feet tall. To put that in perspective, the purpose-built Porsche Boxster sports car is five inches taller than the XL1.

In previous iterations of the XL1, such as the L1 from several years ago, passengers sat in a tandem layout. In the XL1, however, they sit side-by-side, slightly graduated. As you can see from the photos, the interior of the XL1 closely resembles that of current Volkswagen offerings but with a more sparse, futuristic feel.

The Drivetrain

Although Dr. Professor Ferdinand Piëch had envisioned a 1.0-liter car, engineers were actually able to create a 0.8-liter two-cylinder TDI diesel engine for the XL1 by modifying an existing Volkswagen 1.6-liter four-cylinder TDI diesel engine. The diesel motor is mated to a seven-speed DSG dual-clutch transmission with an electric motor and clutch unit in between.

The 20 kW electric motor converts electricity from the 5.5 kWh battery pack from DC to AC, which is used to power the rear wheels. A standard 12-volt DC battery runs the accessories.

VOLKSWAGEN XL1 engine
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Improving efficiency and diminishing emissions further, designers added special recesses in the TDI pistons, allowing for multiple diesel injection. The XL1 emits only 21 grams of CO2 per kilometer, which exceptionally low.

Drivers can choose to operate the XL1 in electric-only mode for up to 32 miles, provided the plug-in battery system is fully charged. When the electric energy is depleted and the TDI engine needs to be started, the XL1 is able to engage the diesel engine virtually seamlessly with what Volkswagen calls “pulse starting.”

VOLKSWAGEN XL1 Drivetrain
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Pulse starting works by speeding up the electric motor rotor up and engaging the clutch between it and the TDI engine, thereby starting the diesel engine. While this might be hard to picture, the result is jolt-free engine starting. This allows the XL1 to stop and start the TDI as needed without disturbing the passengers.

The XL1 is capable of a 99 mile per hour top speed. It will go 0-62 mph in 12.7 seconds. When it’s reached 62 mph, impressively, the XL1 will only use 8.3 horsepower. All told, the XL1 has been rated to achieve a mind-boggling 261-mpg combined fuel-economy score.

The Impact

Volkswagen will only build a select few of the XL1s for an even more selective buyer market. Sadly, the U.S. will not be one of the XL1’s markets. When it does go on sale in Europe, though, industry experts anticipate the XL1 will carry a $40,000 to $67,000 price tag. This might seem a bit steep to some, but we think it’s a small price to pay to have a piece of motoring history, especially on that is so extraordinary to behold and fuel-efficient.

More importantly, Volkswagen will be able to take what it learned from the XL1 drivetrain and body structure and implement it into other future vehicles. In fact, it’s already planned a version of its city car, the “Up,” with the drivetrain from the XL1. With an XL1-powered Up, buyers could easily achieve an estimated 250 mpg. Just like the XL1, though; the Up is not yet scheduled to be sold Stateside.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more