Skip to main content

From the ashes: Jaguar will complete the production run of its legendary XKSS

Jaguar XKSS
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Two years ago, Jaguar reached into its past and conjured up the Lightweight E-Type. Six cars were built by Jag’s Special Vehicle Operations (SVO) division to the specifications of an original 1963 race car to complete a production run Jaguar never had a chance to the first time around.

Fans raved, and the new Lightweight became an instant collectible. That led everyone  ask what SVO would try next. On the eve of the 2016 New York Auto Show, Jaguar let everyone know. And it turns out the next SVO heritage project may be an even bigger deal than the Lightweight E-Type. This is the legend of the XKSS.

Recommended Videos

Confirming previous rumors, Jaguar will complete the production run of one of its most legendary cars which, as with the Lightweight E-Type, was cut short. The XKSS actually started life as the D-Type, a full-on race car that one the 24 Hours of Le Mans and inspired today’s F-Type Project 7 with its unique styling. When the racing program wound down, Jaguar was left with 25 extra D-Types, but then the bosses had an idea.

Those leftover cars were converted into XKSS road cars. They were tamed just enough to not kill their owners, a small group that notably included Steve McQueen. But before the production run could be completed, there was a fire at Jaguar’s Browns Lane factory in England. That fire, on February 12, 1957, destroyed the last nine chassis before they could be completed.

And like a Phoenix, the XKSS is set to return 59 years later. Jaguar will build those last nine cars, making the modern XKSS a “continuation” model, rather than a replica, in spirit at least. As with the Lightweight E-Type, SVO will work from original documents and build the cars exactly as Jaguar would have done in 1957.

If you want one, Jaguar told Digital Trends and the assembled media at its pre-New York show bash that there are still a few available. But expect to pay “in excess” of $1.5 million for the privilege. Jaguar plans to show the first revived XKSS before the end of the year, while the first deliveries will take place in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of the car’s debut.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more