Lexus' RC F GT3 will race on two continents in 2017

By Stephen Edelstein January 16, 2017

Lexus unveiled a racing version of its RC F coupe, called the RC F GT3, early last year, but the car is only now getting to turn a wheel in anger.

The RC F GT3 will get its first taste of competition in 2017, in two different race series on opposite sides of the world. As previously discussed by Lexus, it will compete in the U.S.-based IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. The automaker also announced on Friday that the RC F GT3 will race in the Super GT series, in Lexus’ home country of Japan.

Recommended Videos

Entering the RC F GT3 in both series is pretty straightforward, because the two classes within those series Lexus plans to race in — IMSA’s GT Daytona and Super GT’s GT300 — have similar rules. Both are built around GT3-spec cars like the RC F. These are racers based on production cars that have to retain stock components like the chassis and engine.

In the Super GT series, the RC F GT3 will race alongside its big brother, the LC 500. With its crazy-looking bodywork, the RC F GT3 looks like it would be at home in a Japanese anime series. It uses a version of the 5.0-liter V8 from the road-going RC F, tuned to produce over 500 horsepower, rather than the 467 hp civilians get. That power is sent to the rear wheels through a six-speed sequential gearbox.

The RC F GT3 will make its racing debut later this month at the 2017 Rolex 24 at Daytona, the legendary 24-hour race held at Florida’s Daytona International Speedway. In the GT Daytona class, the Lexus will be tested against a diverse array of opponents, including racing versions of the Ferrari 488 GTB, Lamborghini Huracán, Acura NSX, Audi R8, Porsche 911, Mercedes-AMG GT, and Acura NSX. It should be quite a show.

That all goes down January 29, when the Rolex 24 kicks off. The two-pronged racing program is the latest effort by Lexus to cultivate a sportier image in order to better compete against established German luxury brands in the showroom. It may not be as exciting as the track but, for car companies, that’s where it really counts.

Topics

Stephen Edelstein

Contributing Editor

Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Cars

Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared

Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Cars

Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users

waymo data vulnerable road users ml still 1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.