Skip to main content

Is Lyft too nice for its own good?

lyft too nice follows rules presskit 04
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Do you want to be nice or do you want to make money? Unfortunately, that may be the question ride-hailing service Lyft faces. In contrast to Uber’s more aggressive approach, Lyft makes every attempt to follow rules and regulations, but it hasn’t made a difference, so far. Both companies are growing, but Lyft’s “caring company” strategy may affect profits as Uber gains market share, as reported by Reuters.

When the two companies prepared to launch in Portland, Oregon in 2014, Uber made it clear to city officials it would go ahead with or without their support. Lyft, however, pledged to wait till rules and regulations were in place, and they did. In terms of Portland market share, if not good will among regulators, Uber kicked Lyft’s butt, as it does today throughout the U.S.

Recommended Videos

Portland officials appreciated Lyft’s willingness to discuss policy and wait for regulations to be adopted. Josh Alpert, the mayor’s chief of staff, said, “We were trying to figure out a way to reward Lyft for having better business practices and not violating our laws. Sadly, at the end of the day, it didn’t make a difference.”

Lyft is not abandoning its concerted effort to be portrayed as the “caring company” that treats customers, drivers, and local regulators with respect. Like Uber, Lyft is growing in ridership and the number of drivers. Today Lyft reportedly has 315,000 drivers, about the number Uber claims. Uber has 10 times Lyft’s annual revenue and at $10 billion Uber has 5 times the funding.

Uber is currently ahead in brand recognition and market share, neither of which argues it should “be more like Lyft.” Lyft’s share is growing, however, and, according to co-founder and President John Zimmer, “We’re growing faster. I think that the advantage is we are treating our drivers better, and therefore they are treating their passengers better.”

Portland isn’t the only city that appreciates Lyft’s nice-guy stance. In Broward County, Florida, Commissioner Chip LaMarca said of Uber, “They weren’t listening, and they weren’t willing to compromise on anything. Lyft was different.”

Building good will among government regulators can’t be a bad thing. It may come to pass that Lyft’s actions will benefit the company down the road. For now, Uber is in the lead, but nice-guy Lyft is growing.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Lyft also threatens to shut down California operations over worker law
Lyft

Less than 24 hours after Uber threatened it would shut down its California operations over a new law that requires the company to classify drivers as employees, Lyft followed suit, saying that it would be forced to "suspend operations" in the state if the law isn't reversed.

In an earnings call Wednesday night, August 12, Lyft president John Zimmer said: "If our efforts here are not successful it would force us to suspend operations in California. Fortunately, California voters can make their voices heard by voting yes on Prop 22 in November."

Read more
Lyft sells PPE supplies to its drivers — and some are furious they’re not free
Transportation-Union-And-Rideshare-Drivers-United-Members-Hold-Rolling-Vehicle-Protest

Lyft drivers are slamming the ridesharing company for selling personal protective equipment (PPE) to its drivers through an online store — saying masks and other safety supplies should be provided to them for free. 

“It’s such an unreasonable and overall ridiculous level of cynicism to sell your workers the protective gear that they need for the risks that you expose them to and profit from,” said California Lyft driver Edan Alva. “There’s nothing about it that resembles trying to protect their drivers.”

Read more
California sues Uber, Lyft to force them to make drivers employees
Uber

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is suing Uber and Lyft over their alleged misclassification of their workers as independent contractors instead of as employees. 

Becerra filed a lawsuit against the two rideshare companies on Tuesday, saying that they violated California's new Assembly Bill 5 law that requires app-based companies to identify contractors as regular employees of the company. Under the bill, contractors are eligible for basic protections like minimum-wage requirements, health benefits, and Social Security. 

Read more