McLaren mulling a return to Le Mans by 2016 with the 650S GT3

By Andrew Hard July 3, 2014

It’s been awhile, but McLaren has a rich history with LeMans.

In its first entrance into the French 24-hour race, the British supercar manufacturer took 1^st, 3^rd, 4^th, 5^th, and 13^th with the BMW-engineered F1 GTR in 1995. McLaren continued to race throughout the mid-90s, but success dwindled as the years went on.

In 1998, just two F1 GTRs were entered, and only one managed to place, in fourth. The next year, the GT1 class (where the GTRs resided) was abolished, and thus McLaren was no longer eligible. The Brits tried one more year in a different class, but the car failed to finish and McLaren’s tenure at Le Mans was over.

However, according to a report by AutoSport, McLaren executives believe the time for a return to Le Mans is rapidly approaching.

Andrew Kirkaldy, boss of McLaren GT, said, “I would be very surprised if you don’t see a 650S running at Le Mans at some point and we hope to be there [for] 2016. That’s what we want to do.”

McLaren would likely use a variant the 650S GT3 supercar that was just unveiled at the Goodwood Festival of Speed last month. The car is already a stripped-out, track-bred racehorse, so it would take minimal modifications to qualify the GT3 for Le Mans.

“The new car is not far from a GTE car in some aspects, like the hubs, suspension and bigger wheels and tires — it is a good step towards that,” explained Kirkaldy.

The 650S GT3 is riddled with racing aerodynamics and technology, and features a 3.8-liter, twin-turbo V8 that produces 493 horsepower. It’s mated to a six-speed sequential transmission and pneumatic paddle shifters.

It’s nice to see an ambitious, aggressive attitude from McLaren in 2014. The Brits smashed records with the monumental P1 in 2013, wowed with the 650S and 650S GT3 this year, and are planning to release a new car every year until 2019.

Topics

Photo Galleries

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Andrew first started writing in middle school and hasn't put the pen down since. Whether it's technology, music, sports, or…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.