Skip to main content

Michigan shuts out Tesla direct sales, incurs ire of resident Tesla owners

Tesla logo
philipus/123RF
Michigan doesn’t want Tesla to sell cars outside traditional third-party dealer networks. Tesla doesn’t play that way. And now Michigan Tesla owners are fighting back, according to Electrek.

Following legislation initiated by the Michigan Automobile Dealers Association, passed by the Michigan state legislature, and signed into law by Governor Rick Snyder, that “clarified” the ban on automakers selling their own cars, a number of Tesla owners decided that they had had enough. They formed the Michigan Freedom to Buy Coalition.

Recommended Videos

MiFreedom2Buy lists as its guiding purposes “promoting innovation,” “defending the free market,” and “supporting consumer choice.”  The group is collecting signatures for a petition to legislators in the Michigan Senate and Michigan House of Representatives to have a discussion with Governor Snyder about the future of the automaker-franchise model. According to the group’s website, Snyder stated at the time that, “A healthy, open discussion can and should be had over whether the current business model in Michigan should be changed.”

What some states, including Michigan, Connecticut, North Carolina, and others don’t seem to get, is that selling through third-party dealerships is antithetical to Tesla’s business model. Auto dealerships make most of their money from service, says Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and that won’t work for electric vehicles, which have fewer service needs than internal combustion engine-powered cars and trucks. Musk also has said he thinks making money on service is “terrible.”

In addition, Musk believes that if all-electric cars were sold in a dealership along with ICE vehicles, customers would be steered away from e-cars, both because the sales staff don’t understand them and because dealerships would prefer to sell cars that bring in more service revenue.

Over 400 Michigan Tesla owners currently have to drive to Cleveland or Chicago for service. Tesla has applied for a Michigan dealership and repair license twice, but so far has gotten nowhere.

“It is a very important state. Whether it’s through the legislature or the courts, one way or another, we’re determined to do whatever we need to do in order for justice to prevail and serve our customers in Michigan,” said Todd Maron, Tesla General Counsel.

New legislation, House Bill 5312 to allow direct sales of cars by automakers to consumers was introduced by state representative Aaron Miller, R-Sturgis in February 2016.

In the meantime Tesla owners Jeff Timmer and Andy Keller from MiFreedom2Buy offer Tesla test drives. “We have this archaic law that prevents them (Tesla) from selling here,” said Timmer. “I don’t understand if somebody wants to buy a product why the government should decide who they need to buy it from,” added Keller.

Terry Burns, executive vice president of the Michigan Automobile Dealers Association, which is opposed to any change, has said of the current system that, “It has worked well for many, many years for every manufacturer in the world that has wanted to sell vehicles in the United States and specifically in Michigan.”

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more