Skip to main content

Next BMW M3 will be more powerful, lighter, faster and sport a 450hp twin-turbo inline-six

2014 BMW M3 front three quarterOne of most hotly anticipated cars on the horizon is the redesigned BMW M3, and it looks like it will be worth the wait.

According to Auto Express, which snagged a handful of photos of the new M3, the high-performance 3 Series will be lighter, more powerful and, of course, faster.

Recommended Videos

The current M3’s 4.0-liter V8 will be replaced by a 3.0-liter, twin-turbocharged inline-six, producing around 450 horsepower. That’s at least 36 hp more than the V8 M3, despite the loss of 1.0 liter of displacement and two cylinders.

The six-cylinder also marks a return to form for the M3. The E46-generation car that preceded the current E90/E92 was known for its silky straight six, although that engine was not turbocharged.

The new engine will also be exclusive to the M3, unlike the twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 from the M5 and M6, which does duty in some non-M models.

BMW’s M DCT dual clutch transmission will probably be attached to the new engine, and the company will reportedly offer a manual as well.

For a truly best-of-both-worlds scenario, BMW will make the M3 lighter in addition to boosting power. The new car will weigh around 220 pounds less than the one it’s replacing, thanks to the extensive use of lightweight materials.

The current M3’s carbon fiber roof will return, but the material will also reportedly be used for the hood and trunk lid. The front fenders will be made of composites.

All of those improvements will make the new M3 significantly faster. It’s expected to do 0 to 62 mph (0 to 100 kph) in 4.3 seconds, a few tenths faster than the current M3. Top speed will still be electronically limited to 155 mph, but take the limiter off, and the new M3 will do 180 mph.

2014 BMW M3 rear three quarterThere’s even more new hardware to keep the M3 pointing in the right direction in the corners, including a limited-slip differential and hydraulic power steering. BMW has been phasing out hydraulic steering in favor of more efficient electric systems, but customer complaints over lack of steering feel have apparently convinced the Bavarian brigade to reverse its own trend.

All of that go-fast gear is wrapped in a more aggressive version of the 3 Series’ bodywork. The flared front air intakes, bigger wheels, side vents, and quad exhaust outlets give should be street racers fair warning.

The redesigned M3 is expected to debut later this year, and go on sale next summer. Coupe and convertible versions, badged as M4s but mechanically identical to the sedan, should go on sale following the introduction of the base 4 Series Coupe and Convertible.

With more power, sharper steering, and less weight, all in a practical sedan body, the new M3 promises to be everything we love about the current car, and more.

Like the new M3? Tell us why – or why not – in the comments.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more