Skip to main content

The Nissan Juke NISMO RS is the perfect car for the penny-pinching, unhinged driver

I have never really gotten the Nissan Juke.

It’s a confusing vehicle, from its market segment to its styling. But I think I have cracked it with the brand new NISMO Juke RS that just debuted at the 2013 LA Auto Show.

The Juke is a car for crazy people. 

The thing is, I mean that in a good way. Nissan has built a car that is so unhinged it actually makes sense. All it took was aggressive sport styling and 30 more horsepower.

The engine is the same basic 1.6-liter set up that you get in the standard car, and the ‘normal’ NISMO Juke. For the RS, though, the turbo has been turned up to eleven. The front-wheel drive version will chuck out 215 horsepower and 210 pound-feet of torque. Oddly, the all-drive version of the RS has been detuned to 211 hp and 184 torques.

See what I mean about the Juke being unhinged? Normally, when you give a car more traction; you add power, not take it away. Practically speaking, this has to do with the transmission options. The AWD version is saddled with a CVT that can’t handle quite the same power.

The good old-fashioned six-speed manual that comes with the FWD version can handle the power. But with all that power going through the front wheels things are going to be a bit twitchy, even with the tricked-out helical differential.

Like the normal NISMO Juke, the suspension has been lowered and stiffened. The RS’s suspension may not be that different, but it does get a reinforced sub-frame that adds structural rigidity. The brakes have also been enlarged, so the car should stop at least as fast as it goes.

All these performance tweaks are sure to make a difference, but what really makes the Juke NISMO RS work are the styling changes.  

The best word to describe the normal Juke’s styling is funky. You are not going to confuse it for anything else on the road, but to achieve this unique look Nissan’s designers resorted to lines that can only be called ‘ugly’.  

By lowering it, adding a front splitter, and adding some sporting touches like red side view mirrors Nissan’s designers have pulled the Juke together. The changes certainly don’t make the Juke NISMO RS a pretty car, but they make all that funkiness seem intentional. 

I like the effect. The Juke RS looks cool and unique, almost as if it came out of an especially well crafted manga.

I still think you would have to be crazy to buy the Juke NISMO RS over something like a Golf GTI or a MINI Cooper Countryman JCW. But, if you were that crazy, you would be getting a car that stands out and sets you apart from the people in practical, restrained hatchbacks and crossovers. In short, you would be crazy, but the kind of crazy I respect. 

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more