Skip to main content

Nissan’s old school Xterra SUV won’t be climbing mountains anymore

If there’s any indication of how much the SUV segment has changed over the past 15 years, it’s the decline of the Nissan Xterra. When the vehicle with the extreme-sounding name was introduced, most SUVs had traditional body-on-frame platforms, and off-road ability was a major selling point.

But amid a sea of car-like crossovers and greater concerns over fuel economy, the Xterra apparently just can’t compete anymore. Nissan won’t bring the Xterra back for the 2016 model year, once again reducing the number of traditional SUVs available on dealer lots.

Recommended Videos

“The last Xterra will be sold in the fall of 2015,” Nissan said in a press release detailing its 2016 model year changes. The carmaker says over 750,000 Xterras have been sold since the SUV was introduced for the 2000 model year.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The Xterra was first introduced as a smaller counterpart to Nissan’s Pathfinder, using the Frontier pickup-truck platform, right when the SUV boom began. While few mainstream cars in the early 2000s could stir much emotion, the promise of off-road adventure captured the public’s imagination, even if most members of the public used their SUVs for school runs and shopping trips only.

With funky styling elements like a stepped roofline, and a first-aid kit compartment bulging out of the tailgate, the Xterra was well equipped to take advantage of this trend. A traditional, manual four-wheel drive system gave it some off-road chops as well.

The model survived into a second generation unveiled in 2005, again on the Frontier platform. But the Xterra’s past 10 years haven’t been as rosy as its first five. The current Xterra has had to weather declining interest in body-on-frame SUVs with few updates. Even the Xterra’s big sibling, the Pathfinder, eventually moved to a crossover platform for the 2012 model year.

Get behind the wheel of an Xterra, and it’s easy to see why the model is on its way out. The interior plastics are not up to current standards, infotainment options are limited, the driving experience is decidedly truck-y and, with four-wheel drive, fuel economy is a dismal 17 mpg combined. As far as styling, Nissan’s Murano will probably draw more looks from bystanders today.

Still, the Xterra has its charms. It knows what it is, and doesn’t try to pretend to be anything else. And from now on, buyers who want their SUV to be more than just a tall station wagon will have one less choice.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV is old-school luxury — electrified
Front three quarter view of the Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV.

Mercedes-Benz is preparing for an electric future with its EQ models, a line of EVs with futuristic aerodynamic styling and all of the latest infotainment tech. With several EQ models already in production, Mercedes is shifting focus to more traditional luxury.
The Mercedes-Maybach EQS SUV is the first all-electric vehicle from Maybach, the ultra-luxury subbrand of Mercedes. It takes the EQS SUV launched in 2022 and bathes it in opulence, adding more chrome on the outside and more creature comforts on the inside.
Scheduled to go on sale in the U.S. this fall, the Maybach is an unusual EV proposition, taking what is supposed be a forward-thinking design and wrapping it in old-school luxury. Ahead of its launch, Digital Trends got an up-close look at the Maybach EQS SUV to see how Mercedes is trying to balance those two aspects.

Germany's Rolls-Royce goes electric
The Maybach name has great historical significance for Mercedes. Wilhelm Maybach was one of the earliest automotive engineers. He designed the first Mercedes-branded car for the Daimler company (now Daimler-Benz), but struck out on his own after a falling out with company management. His eponymous company built Zeppelin engines, luxury cars, and, during World War II, engines for German military vehicles.
Daimler-Benz took control of Maybach in the 1960s, but left the passenger-car business dormant. Mercedes then revived the Maybach name in the early 2000s as a competitor to the likes of Rolls-Royce and Bentley, both of which are owned by rival German automakers. Given Wilhelm Maybach's history with Mercedes, it essentially brought things full circle.
The 21st-century Maybach brand started out with standalone models in the form of the Maybach 57 and Maybach 62 sedans (as well as the stunning Exelero prototype), but production ended in 2012 amid dwindling sales. Mercedes then switched to making Maybach-branded versions of existing models like the S-Class sedan and GLS-Class SUV, a pattern that continues with the Maybach EQS SUV.

Read more
Developers help older Macs do something Apple won’t allow
Apple's Craig Federighi using an iPhone as a webcam with Continuinty Camera in macOS Ventura.

They said your Mac was too old for the latest and greatest Mac OS upgrade. They told you to buy a new Mac instead. Apple can be a harsh companion. But I'm here to tell you there is another way, the way of MacOS Ventura on older Macs.

The team of developers behind the OpenCore Legacy Patcher, a free software tool that allows unsupported Macs to run Big Sur and Monterey, is working on bringing Ventura into the fold. No longer can Big Apple tell you what you do with your Mac.

Read more
You won’t be taking Microsoft’s HoloLens 3 into the metaverse
Microsoft HoloLens 2

As rival Apple is rumored to be eyeing an entrance into the metaverse, Microsoft, an early proponent of mixed and augmented reality applications, is criticized for its blurry vision behind the company's own HoloLens strategy. While HoloLens notched big early wins, including scoring a U.S. Department of Defense contract, subsequent delays, project cancellations, and high-profile executive departures may have resulted in the death of the HoloLens 3. Still, despite a scathing profile by Business Insider, it appears that Microsoft remains, at least publicly, committed to its HoloLens endeavors for now. The company has gone on record to refute the publication's reporting that HoloLens 3 has been killed.

There are a number of factors that may be causing Microsoft to pivot from its early bet on HoloLens, but the Microsoft profile cited internal divisions and the lack of a unified strategy among the top reasons for concern. As a result of the chaos, it appears that the largest collateral damage to Microsoft's infighting is the cancellation of its next-generation HoloLens 3 hardware.

Read more