Skip to main content

Uber beaten by Singapore’s NuTonomy in race to launch first driverless taxi service

nuTonomy | Tomorrow's car, today
As you read this, there are self-driving taxis tootling about the streets of Singapore picking up and dropping off regular folks like you and me.

The service, launched by driverless vehicle software startup NuTonomy, hit the streets of the island city-state on Thursday. It claims to be the first company in the world to offer members of the public rides in driverless cars, beating out competition not only from Uber, which is prepping a similar service for Pittsburgh, but also outfits such as GM and Lyft, which also have the same aim.

Recommended Videos

Singapore-based riders will be able to request a NuTonomy taxi using their smartphone – for free at the start – though with only six vehicles on the road at launch, you may have to strike it lucky to have a driverless car come pick you up. More cars will be rolled out in the next two years, according to an AP report.

Oh, and don’t expect to travel too far. For now, the cars will be puttering along the streets of the city’s 2.5-square-mile “one-north” business and residential district. You also have to put your name down in advance. “Dozens” of people are included in the initial launch phase, NuTonomy said, though it hopes to increase that number to “thousands” over the next couple of months.

Similar to Uber’s Pittsburgh plan, NuTonomy’s cars, which are adapted Renault Zoe and Mitsubishi i-MiEV electrics, have a person in the driving seat in the event of an unexpected malfunction, and another individual in the back keeping an eye on real-time data gathered by the car’s on-board computers.

The vehicles are fitted with an array of sensors, including multiple sets of Lidar – a laser-based radar system that helps to monitor traffic conditions – and several advanced dash cameras that perform a similar function.

While plenty of firms around the world are investing heavily in developing their own driverless car systems, NuTonomy also has local competition from automobile technology supplier Delphi, which aims to start testing a similar self-driving taxi service next year.

As for NuTonomy, the hope is that driverless taxis could one day help to cut the number of vehicles on Singapore’s crowded roads by as many 600,000, bringing the figure down to a more acceptable 300,000.

“When you’re able to take that many cars off the road, it creates a lot of possibilities,” NuTonomy CEO Doug Parker told AP. “You can create smaller roads, you can create much smaller car parks – I think it will change how people interact with the city going forward.”

NuTonomy actually started life in the U.S., founded in 2013 by Karl Iagnemma and Emilio Frazzoli of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It’s currently headquartered in Cambridge, MA, though also has a base in Singapore to oversee its work there.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Nuro’s driverless delivery pod greenlighted for California trial
nuros driverless delivery pod greenlit for california trial nuro autonomous

Nuro caught our eye a long time ago with its cool-looking autonomous pod (pictured below) designed for grocery delivery.

And now it’s been given the green light to test its compact autonomous vehicle on the streets of California.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more