Skip to main content

Volvo and Ericsson partner to radically reshape the ‘Connected Car’

When I think of tech, places like Palo Alto, Seattle, or Tokyo come to mind. So it was with some interest and trepidation that I agreed to attend Volvo’s connected car workshop in Stockholm, Sweden last week. In retrospect, I shouldn’t have worried; Volvo is partnered with a tech industry giant, albeit a stereotypically understated Scandinavian giant: Ericsson.

Volvo is refreshing its entire model line-up in the next five years, so the work done by Ericsson and Volvo now will define the future of Volvo’s tech for at least the next decade. What the two companies have in mind is radical. Volvo and Ericsson envision cars of the future that will not just be communicate with their drivers, but other cars and the very roads themselves.

A new system for a new age

At the heart of the new connected Volvo is Sensus, the company’s new infotainment system. The heart of the system is a large, tablet-style touchscreen. While the Sensus screen is bigger and more attractive than most, many automakers can boast a big, pretty screen. What really sets Volvo’s system apart is the philosophy behind it – namely, ease of use.

Volvo HMI 3
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Using Sensus is a lot like using an iPad. The home screen displays four tabs: navigation, entertainment, phone, and one that displays whichever app the driver chooses to have active. Climate controls are accessible via the bottom of the screen no matter what is centrally displayed, and more in-depth menus can be accessed by swiping side to side. Tap on a tab and it goes full screen. Tap on the single hard button near the screen and the system smoothly transitions back to the home screen.

Figuring out Sensus took me just five minutes … without anyone first explaining it to me. This simplicity is the result of a great deal of testing, and a philosophy that runs throughout a lot of Volvo’s approach to tech. Namely, that technology should make the driver’s life easier, not more complicated. On screen that means excellent information display. Behind the scenes, however, the story gets even more interesting.

Quite the talker

Consumers might never see an Ericsson branded product, but they are everywhere. 40 percent of the world’s mobile calls go through Ericsson systems. So it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Volvo’s partnership with the tech giant is going to have something to do with communication.

In and of itself, that is nothing new. Cars have been sending and receiving large quantities of data for a while now. What Volvo and Ericsson have in mind is a bit more interesting, however. Volvo wants to see its cars communicating not just with cloud services like Pandora or Google Earth, but also with each other and with road infrastructure.

Let me explain what that looks like in practice. A Volvo is driving along on a winter road when it hits a patch of ice – oh no! But even as the traction and stability control react to the loss of traction, the systems are sending out a message to all the other Volvo cars on the road. If those cars approach that patch of ice, a warning will flash in the vehicle’s heads up display (HUD).

XC90 Safety 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It doesn’t end there; this system was designed by socially responsible Swedes. The same warning can also be sent to whichever road authority manages the affected area. That means an efficient Scandinavian road crew can be sent out to deal with the roadway issue. This system might sound a bit futuristic, but Volvo is beginning pilot tests in Sweden this very winter.

There are lots of other applications for this kind of inter-car communication, ranging from having deliveries sent straight to a driver’s car via a temporary virtual key, to communicating with traffic lights for less wait time and more efficient route calculation.

It is with these sorts of ideas that the Ericsson partnership really comes into play. Not only does Ericsson have the hardware to make these sorts of programs possible, they also have the infrastructure both physically and institutionally to make car to infrastructure and car to business communication a reality.

Conclusion

In the end, what impressed me most from my time in the Volvo Connected Car workshop was not so much the specific ideas but the philosophy behind them.

By focusing on giving the driver only useful information, Volvo is hoping to give the driver less to do, and less to worry about. While it remains to be seen if the technology Volvo is working on can actually accomplish that goal, it is at least a refreshing change of pace from the normal race to cram in the largest possible number of features.

We look forward very much to getting behind the wheel of not only the all-new XC90 and testing its driving dynamics, but also its slew of new technologies.

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more