Ferrari tuner Novitec turns its talents to Rolls-Royce and the result is pretty special

By Stephen Edelstein September 30, 2014

Rolls-Royce is trying to shift from being a brand for people who enjoy being driven, to a brand for people that enjoy driving, and it looks like the company is getting that point across.

These days, a maker of performance cars hasn’t really arrived until an aftermarket company begins tuning its products, and now Rolls

Famous for tuning Ferraris, Novitec recently established a new division focused on modifying the the British luxury cars.

Novitec does this with each make it decides work with. In addition to the original Ferrari division, Novitec Rosso, there’s also Novitec Torado for Lamborghini, and Novitec Tridente for Maserati.

So what name did Novitec pick for its Rolls-Royce division?

Spofec. It’s not the coolest-sounding name, but at least it’s applied to a pretty cool-looking Rolls-Royce Ghost.

Two tuning packages will be offered for the Ghost’s twin-turbocharged 6.6-liter V12, which already puts out 563 horsepower and 575 pound-feet of torque in stock form.

Related: Mansory debuts 740-horsepower Rolls-Royce Wraith

The stage one package boosts output to 685 hp and 706 lb-ft of torque, while stage two turns up the wick even further with 708 hp and 721 lb-ft.

That will allow the nearly 5,500-pound Ghost to hurl itself from 0 to 62 mph in just 4.4 seconds, while top speed remains limited to 155 mph.

With so much power on tap, it would be interesting to see what terminal velocity this stately sedan could reach with the limiter removed.

In addition to mind-boggling power, Spofec also offers upgraded suspension and carbon-ceramic brakes. On the aesthetic front, the tuned Ghost features unique 22-inch alloy wheels and a subtle body kit.

These upgrades are only available on the Ghost right now, but Spofec will soon make them available on the mechanically-similar Wraith coupe.

The transformation of a Rolls-Royce into a fast-and-furious tuner special is, to say the least, unexpected.

It may seem blasphemous to traditional Rolls enthusiasts, but this focus on performance is likely to become more normal as the carmaker continues to reinvent itself.

Topics

Photo Galleries

Stephen Edelstein

Contributing Editor

Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Cars

Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared

Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Cars

Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users

waymo data vulnerable road users ml still 1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.