Volvo's S60 Polestar left its mark on Nurburgring history in complete silence

By Ronan Glon May 30, 2017

Revealing a secret from the Nürburgring Nordschleife

The 13-mile long Nürburgring track in Germany has morphed into another promotional tool for automakers. From Hyundai to Ferrari, car companies head to the Green Hell to outdo each other and vociferously brag about the results. Volvo earned coveted bragging rights last year, but it surprisingly decided to keep quiet.

Polestar — Volvo’s in-house speed division — explains its team remained at the ‘Ring after last year’s FIA World Touring Car Championship (WTCC) race to carry out tests away from the prying eyes of spy photographers and iPhone-wielding fans. The company’s mission was to push the S60 Polestar to its limit for a few days, and gather valuable data for future car programs.

Recommended Videos

Driven by a professional pilot, a fully stock S60 Polestar lapped the Nürburgring in seven minutes, 51 seconds, and 11 milliseconds. Polestar wasn’t out to set a record, but the blue sedan nonetheless became the fastest regular-production four-door car around the track.

“Being Swedish, we didn’t want to shout about the record. Just learn from the experience,” explains the company.

Volvo didn’t hang on to the record for long. A twin-turbocharged, 503-horsepower V6 engine helped the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio go around the track in seven minutes and 39 seconds. In July of last year, the brand-new second-generation Porsche Panamera Turbo set a new record for regular-production four-door sedans by lapping the ‘Ring in seven minutes and 38 seconds, barely a second faster than the Giulia.

Alfa Romeo fired back. A Giulia Quadrifoglio equipped with an eight-speed automatic transmission set the current record of seven minutes and 32 seconds.

Polestar doesn’t use ‘Ring times for marketing purposes, so it won’t try to recapture the crown from Alfa Romeo. However, it promises the lessons learned while carrying out tests on one of the most grueling tracks in the world will be applied to future race cars, and upcoming Polestar-badged models.

Topics

Contributor

Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Cars

Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared

Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Cars

Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users

waymo data vulnerable road users ml still 1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.