Skip to main content

FCC report says 16 million Americans are without broadband Internet access altogether

5 percent americans lack broadband laptop quad core processor feat
Ivan Kruk/Shutterstock
Broadband Internet speeds are defined by the FCC as being at least 25Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream, a considerably fair assessment given the rampancy of our current tech climate. Unfortunately, Internet service providers and congressional Republicans are inclined to disagree with this definition.

By the FCC’s standard, 34 million Americans, meaning about 10 percent of the country, don’t even have the option to subscribe to home broadband Internet. Using the specifications of the ISPs and Republican Congress, still, an embarrassing 16.1 million can’t get their hands on a measly 4Mbps/1Mbps service, which would be impossibly sluggish by today’s standards.

Recommended Videos

Nevertheless, the ideals of ISPs and Congress are completely negligible to begin with considering their antiquity and the fact that the FCC ditched the 4Mbps/1Mbps definition just over a year ago. And, even if the FCC decided to give in to critics and revert back to the old definition, the numbers would still suggest the ugly truth, which is that a sizable chunk of Americans — mainly in rural areas — still can’t access competent Internet speeds.

“At slower speeds,” the FCC broadband progress report begins, “6 percent of Americans lack access to fixed terrestrial service at 10Mbps/1Mbps and 5 percent lack access to such services at 4Mbps/1Mbps.”

This means that, still, an abundant 19.9 million Americans can’t get home Internet speeds of 10Mbps/1Mbps. Evidently, these statistics fail to address satellite Internet services due to their infrastructure’s notorious reliability issues and paltry monthly data caps.

While Congress is supposed to make sure the FCC determines how pervasive broadband access is in the United States, it’s the commission’s responsibility to decide what speeds should and shouldn’t be deemed broadband. Since the FCC’s annual reports are always about a year behind, here’s what both 4Mbps/1Mbps and 10Mbps/1Mbps availability looked like from December 31, 2014:

fcc-fixed-broadband-640x299
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Though the number of Americans who can access 25Mbps/3Mbps broadband Internet is on the rise since 2012, there are actually more people since then who don’t have access to a mere 4Mbps/1Mbps service. In fact, only 16.1 million (6 percent) Americans have access to the slower 4Mbps/1Mbps speeds as opposed to the 19 million (5 percent) of Americans who could get it in 2012.

The FCC changed its definition of broadband Internet last year as a response to a surge in household using multiple devices on a single connection in addition to HD video streaming. In fact, it was FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel who urged a 100Mbps standard, though unfortunately, her position was rejected.

Gabe Carey
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A freelancer for Digital Trends, Gabe Carey has been covering the intersection of video games and technology since he was 16…
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more
M4 vs. M3: How much better are Apple’s latest chips?
An official rendering of the Apple M4 chip.

Apple has begun outfitting its Macs with the M4 chip, following the chip’s debut in the iPad Pro in spring 2024. But not every Mac comes with the M4 -- several are still sporting the previous-generation M3, which offers impressive performance in its own right. These devices are expected to make the switch over the coming months.

That means there’s a split between M3 Macs and their M4 siblings, and the big question is whether you should upgrade. Is the M4 a large upgrade over the M3, or will you be fine sticking with the older chip? What sort of performance do the M3 and M4 offer, and how do they work under the hood? We’ve analyzed all the similarities and differences so that you know exactly what you should buy.
Where can you find these chips?

Read more