Skip to main content

A peek at Casio’s prototype robot watch

bluetooth watchCasio is definitely drawing attention to its camera lineups this year, but it’s also got a watch prototype that’s getting some hype. It’s a Bluetooth enabled wristwatch that connects to a users smartphone. Developers have been making this kind of device for awhile, with the caveat being the necessity of a charger. Casio has engineered the ability for its prototype to use a standard watch battery (which generally last two years) to power the device while still making it Bluetooth 4.0 enabled.

The watch will connect to a phone, so that you get an alert on your wrist when you get calls, texts, or any other type of update. You can even reject a call or ignore an e-mail from the watch, as well as view your calendar. Possibly the most attractive feature is the automatic time zone update, so travelers will appreciate the immediately updated time change. In the future, Casio hopes to add public transportation, fitness and GPS functions.

Recommended Videos

We were warned to ignore the hardware, because it is a prototype and its looks are far from finalized – so don’t get too nervous about that impossibly small face on the watch. But even though it’s in beta, we were told that Casio projects a 2011 or 2012 debut, and claims that the watch won’t grossly out-price its other models. The relatively lengthy release date will also allow smartphones to catch up to its 4.0 capability.

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more