Skip to main content

AMD’s 16-core Ryzen CPU may have been held up by lower-than-advertised speed

AMD’s 16-core Ryzen 3950X is set to be released in November, following a slight delay from its original October launch date. But while that was thought to be due to supply issues of the 7nm chiplets that all Ryzen 3000 processors rely on, it may, in fact, be more of a quality control issue. The problem, according to the latest rumor, is that the 3950X just isn’t fast enough to meet expectations.

AMD’s Ryzen 3000-series processors changed the mainstream CPU market for good with the introduction of high-speed 7nm cores that are great at single-threaded and multithreaded tasks, with more cores at the top end than we’ve ever seen — all at an affordable price. But AMD has run into some issues with these processors not hitting their advertised boost clocks by up to 200MHz in some cases. The 3950X, although set to be the most selectively binned of all Ryzen 3000 chips, could well be facing a similar problem.

Recommended Videos

The 3950X will be the first 16-core mainstream processor ever and with a price of just $750, it would undercut and likely outperform, many of Intel’s $1,000-or-higher HEDT chips. It might not even need to hit its rated 4.7GHz single-threaded boost clock to do so, either. But considering the strong wave of popular opinion that AMD has enjoyed in recent months, and the relative dip it took following the boost clock debacle with its other processors, it might make a lot of sense to delay a similarly problematic CPU that will serve as the flagship of the entire generation.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

According to DigiTimes sources, that’s exactly what’s happened. Its report suggests that previously announced clock speeds were not being hit by the 3950X. It’s hoped that with a couple of months of refinement, those problems can be ironed out before release.

AMD’s response to the clock speed issues elsewhere in the Ryzen lineup has been mixed. It has attempted to skirt around the issue, suggesting in some statements that the problem isn’t pernicious or even that pertinent, since few applications use just one thread at a time. But following further investigations by the enthusiast community, press, and professional overclockers such as Roman “Der8auer” Hartung, AMD released several BIOS updates which have mostly fixed the issue for the wider user base.

The question now remains, whether it can do it for one of the most exciting CPU launches of the year. The clock is ticking.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
AMD’s new CPU could silently replace the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D CPU.

AMD just expanded its lineup of gaming CPUs, but it's not a Zen 5 chip. Instead, AMD launched a new Zen 4 CPU, the Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Once again a Micro Center exclusive, the CPU could be an interesting budget offering ... if not for the fact that it still costs a pretty penny. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D seems to be disappearing from the market. What's going on?

The fact that AMD revisited the Zen 4 lineup is not surprising, as it still continues to release Zen 3 chips. It's also not shocking that the Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a Micro Center exclusive, as the Ryzen 5 5600X3D was also only available at that one retailer. In the case of the 7600X3D, though, it'll also be available in Germany through Mindfactory.

Read more
Your AMD Ryzen CPU is about 10% slower than it should be
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X installed in a motherboard.

AMD's Zen 5 CPUs haven't been able to impress in gaming, showing only small generational improvements -- but there are still some free frame rates to be won here. According to a comprehensive set of gaming benchmarks, a new Windows Update might be all that it takes to improve the performance of AMD's best processors, and this includes Zen 4 CPUs, too.

Earlier this month, Hardware Unboxed revealed that AMD's latest CPUs might be missing out on some frames per second (fps) in games due to a Windows bug. Switching to an Admin account (which is a little harder than it seems to be) fixed the problem, boosting both Zen 4 and Zen 5 CPUs by a considerable amount. AMD also hinted that this might be the issue behind Zen 5's lackluster performance, although it also blamed other factors, such as using different test suites or not running on Admin mode.

Read more
Zen 5 was a letdown, but it may not have been entirely AMD’s fault
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X installed in a motherboard.

Although AMD's new CPUs are some of the best processors, they don't offer that much of an uplift when compared to their last-gen counterparts. The reason might lie in a recently discovered Windows bug that affects Ryzen gaming performance. This could mean that Zen 5 is more impressive than it seems at a glance.

But there's a catch. While Zen 5 performance improves if you address the bug, the same thing happens to Zen 4 CPUs, effectively maintaining or closing the gap between the two generations. Here's how it all works.

Read more