Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Versus

AMD 9070 XT is a good upgrade over the 7800 XT

Add as a preferred source on Google
AMD's RX 7700 XT in a test bench.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The AMD RX 9070 XT has been hailed as the best graphics card to launch in 2025 — although that’s a low bar to meet. Still, it’s great to have a powerful, somewhat-affordable new card, especially since AMD’s last-generation RX 7000-series GPUs are getting a little long in the tooth. But how does the newly-iconic 9070 XT compare against one of the best last-generation cards (and one of the only still available), the RX 7800 XT?

Here’s how they match up.

Recommended Videos

Pricing and availability

AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The RX 7800 XT launched in September 2023, with a recommend price of $500. It’s sat around that ever since, with some mild fluctuation. It’s one of the few cards to survive the recent price boom in GPUs, too, and you can still find a few 7800 XTs around for between $500 and $600. That’s not amazing value in 2025 when there are newer, faster cards out there, but with stock and pricing problems across the board, it’s arguably not bad.

The 9070 XT launched at the start of March 2025 with a price tag of $600, but it quickly went out of stock, just like everything else launched this year. Unfortunately, that means that the price is all over the place at the time of writing, with the XT model going for anywhere between $700 when it’s in stock, to over $1,000 when paying the scalper’s price.

Specifications

AMD RX 9070 XT AMD RX 7800 XT
Transisitors 53.9 billion 28.1 billion
Die size 357mm squared 346mm squared
Compute units 64 60
Ray accelerators 64 60
AI accelerators 128 60
Shader units 4096 3840
Game clock 2400 MHz 2124 MHz
Boost clock 2970 MHz 2430 MHz
Memory 16GB GDDR6 16GB GDDR6
Memory speed 20 Gbps 20 Gbps
Memory bus 256-bit 256-bit
Total board power 304W 263W

The specifications of these two cards are intriguing, because on the surface they don’t look that dissimilar. There have similar numbers of shader units and compute units, similarly sized dies, the same memory and memory bus. But it’s when you dig into the details that the differences really stand out.

AMD has managed to pack close to double the transistors into the same size die. That’s doubly impressive since AMD isn’t using a smaller process node this generation. All those transistors allow AMD to double its number of AI accelerators and boost the capabilities of its RT accelerators. It’s also given a lot more power to the core, allowing for much faster boost clocks.

That has resulted in an increase in board power, but only about 17%.

Performance

We haven’t had a chance to test the 9070 XT ourselves yet, but taking a look at the benchmark results of these cards in various reviews and tests makes it clear that the 9070 XT is much faster than the 7800 XT. Indeed, AMD’s own graphs suggested it could be as much as 66% faster than the 7900 GRE (though more like 42% on average), which is a card that’s already 10% faster than the 7800 XT.

Benchmark for the RX 9070 XT.
AMD

If we consider a wider spread of games, though, with more of an emphasis on general rasterization rather than raytracing, and don’t factor FSR4 frame generation, the 9070 XT is roughly 35% faster than the 7800 XT, which is a very respectable generational upgrade.

However, it can go much further. With overclocking, we’ve seen the 9070 XT eclipse even the RTX 5080, which is over 65% faster than the 7800 XT, and much, much more expensive than even the 9070 XT’s inflated price tag.

A benchmark of the RX 9070 XT and the RTX 5080 FE.
der8auer

That is dependent on the model of 9070 XT you use, your own system cooling, and your ability to overclock in the first place, but the potential is certainly there for this card to be far faster than it is at stock. While you can overclock the 7800 XT too, it doesn’t have the same headroom as the new card and won’t deliver the same kind of uplift, even in ideal scenarios.

The additional upscaling capabilities of the 9070 XT shouldn’t be discounted, either. The additional AI accelerators and new-generation design makes them much more capable than the 7800 XT in boosting frame rates with FSR and frame generation in compatible games makes a huge difference. The list of supporting games isn’t long at the moment, but it’s growing all the time.

The 9070 XT is much better, if you can get it

Buying graphics cards in 2025 is not easy. Prices are crazy, stocks are low, and the FOMO is real. But if you can wait out these turbulent times, there’s no question that the 9070 XT is the better card here. It’s much faster, overclocks like mad, has impressive ray tracing performance, and its new upscaling and frame generation capabilities are awesome. Nothing that AMD has ever made before can match it in the right setting.

But don’t discount the 7800 XT just yet. Indeed, if you have one, don’t rush to upgrade it unless you have a very real reason to. It’s still a strong card, and until prices come down, it still offers strong value for money. I wouldn’t necessarily buy one new, but then if you have around $600 to spend, there’s nothing out there that offers that kind of value right now. Prices should come down in the future, but if you need a new card right now, the 7800 XT is still a decent buy.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
I spent a fortune on a Copilot+ PC, and I’ve barely ever touched Microsoft’s AI
Microsoft needs to give Copilot+ PC owners a reason to use Copilot
Copilot

There is a dedicated Copilot key on my ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED. Months after buying the laptop, it may be one of the least important keys on the entire keyboard. My Zenbook UM3406 runs on AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series processor, complete with a dedicated NPU offering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance. That qualifies it as a Copilot+ PC, which makes it a part of what Microsoft once described as the new era for Windows.

AI is already a regular part of my workday. I use it for research, brainstorming, and working through ideas. But rather than relying on something built into the Windows OS, I've relied on the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Read more
I bought into a brighter future, but my digital life bills monthly subscriptions
My day runs on streaming, cloud storage, AI, transport, and smart devices. None of it feels expensive until I realize almost nothing is ever fully paid for
Light, Adult, Female

Before I’ve properly started the day, several companies have already clocked in. Spotify or YouTube Premium handles the music, Google One keeps my files available, and an AI subscription is waiting in another tab to help me work faster.

Most of these charges earn their place. They save time, remove friction, and keep the day moving. I barely notice them until I think about what would stop working if one payment didn’t go through.

Read more
What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces
Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software
Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Read more