Skip to main content

AMD is on the rise, but its processor market share is nowhere near 40%

AMD has been on one giant winning streak ever since the release of its first-generation Ryzen processors in 2017 and it’s showing no signs of slowing. While that has translated to a large increase in its user base, some outlets and publications are reporting AMD market share has now hit 40%, which isn’t even close to the truth. AMD is doing well, but not that well. Yet.

Until the release of first generation Ryzen processors, everyone knew that if you wanted to bang for buck on a budget, you bought AMD. If you wanted anything else, especially gaming performance, you bought Intel. But that all changed with Ryzen. With AMD’s Ryzen 3000 CPUs, it’s almost been turned on its head with Intel having to cut prices to stay competitive.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900x
AMD’s 12-core Ryzen 3700X has proved incredibly popular with the Zen 2 generation of chips. Dan Baker/Digital Trends

Over the past few months we’ve seen reports of AMD dominating DIY markets in Germany, with more than 80% of CPU sales. Enthusiast groups overwhelmingly prefer AMD too, and most recently, the PassMark benchmark survey reported that 40% of its users were running AMD CPUs.

Recommended Videos

That’s an amazing statistic at face value. Some publications have reported at face value, suggesting that AMD now controls almost half of the processor market. But that’s just simply not true.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

PassMark is a fantastic benchmark, but its user base is not universal or exhaustive. It focuses entirely on Intel and AMD CPUs, so doesn’t consider alternatives that make up a few scant percent of the total. It’s Windows-only, so excludes alternative operating systems like Chrome OS, Linux, and MacOS. It is also a benchmark that targets enthusiasts keen to test out their new system, so does not have a broad, mainstream demographic.

PassMark’s data points do show a significant increase in AMD CPUs running the benchmark, which suggests that more AMD CPUs have been bought by enthusiasts. But taken in isolation, those results could be misleading. Intel hasn’t released much in the way of desktop CPUs this year, whereas AMD has. That makes it more likely that new AMD CPU owners will want to test out their system and see what it can do, running benchmarks like PassMark. Intel CPU owners may be less inclined to do so.

If we look at some other data points to cross reference PassMark’s findings, things aren’t quite so rosy for the red team. In the Steam Hardware Survey, which encapsulates some 90 million monthly active gamers, Intel absolutely dominates with almost 84% of the market, while AMD languishes on just 16%. That’s on the back of a more than three percent surge for Intel in December 2019, destroying almost all the gains AMD had made throughout the months before.

Market research firm, Mercury Research, released a report in November which claimed that AMD’s desktop market share had increased to 18 percent, a rise of 5% year on year. Its share of the laptop space had jumped to 14.7%.

Intel maintains a dominant hold on the market and the global mindshare.

The most exciting stat for AMD in other reports is Forbes’ breakdown of both it and Intel’s fortunes. It claims that after pulling back a few percent of market share in 2017 and 2018, AMD sat at 33% of the CPU market, as of December 2019. That’s impressive. But it’s still a long way from that coveted 40% figure that’s being touted.

None of this should take away from the fact that AMD is surging in the wake of its own successes, and Intel’s repeated failings over the past few years. In PassMark’s own data set, AMD hasn’t been doing this well since 2007, and as other sources show, its market share is rising. If Intel’s underwhelming Comet Lake leaks are anything to go by, that’s likely continue into the future.

But Intel maintains a dominant hold on the market and the global mindshare. It’s true that enthusiasts and those most tuned in to the latest and greatest technology are flocking to AMD Ryzen processors — and with good reason — but those who have always used Intel, or are upgrading older systems are not guaranteed to switch based on reviews and stats alone. Intel has been on the top of the pile for a long time, and it’s going to take more months and years of competition for AMD to claw its way closer to market parity.

It’s getting there. But it’s not at 40%. Not yet.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
AMD and Intel have formed a coalition to fight off Qualcomm
An Intel executive holding a Lunar Lake CPU.

AMD and Intel are teaming up. Shocking, yes, but the two giants who duke it out over the making the best processors are joining forces as the leaders of the new x86 ecosystem advisory group, the stated mission of which is "bringing together technology leaders to shape the future of the world’s most widely used computing architecture."

For those of you that get sufficient vitamin D, x86 is an instruction set architecture, or ISA. It's been around for nearly 50 years, and it's the bedrock of modern computing. An ISA dictates how a CPU reads and executes instructions. AMD and Intel may be fierce rivals, but they are the two major companies producing x86 processors today. Although AMD and Intel are leading the group, an ensemble of massive tech companies have also joined, including Microsoft, Google, HP, Dell, Broadcom, Lenovo, and Oracle.

Read more
Intel did the unthinkable with its new Arrow Lake CPUs
A render of an Intel Core Ultra 200-S chip.

It finally happened. Intel killed Hyper-Threading on its desktop CPUs. The new Arrow Lake range, called Core Ultra 200S, ditches the simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) feature that Intel has held onto for more than a decade. And according to Intel, it doesn't need the extra threads to still deliver a generational performance improvement, even up against the best processors.

Intel says the new range, which we break down in detail in our post focused its gaming potential, can deliver an 8% performance improvement in single-threaded workloads over the previous generation, and a 4% uplift compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X. Those are pretty small margins, but the real impressive stuff comes in multi-threaded performance.

Read more
Buy now, fix later — PC hardware feels like it’s in early access
CPU pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X.

PC hardware is feeling increasingly unstable at launch, and that really came into view with AMD's release of Ryzen 9000 CPUs. AMD released several updates for these CPUs in the weeks following their release, boosting performance by significant margins. That performance was absent from these CPUs at launch, as you can read in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review, suggesting they weren't quite ready for prime time when they released in August.

AMD isn't alone here. Although Intel's 13th-gen and 14th-gen didn't have big issues at release, they've faced a major instability crisis that forced Intel to replace an untold number of impacted CPUs. Between the latest two generations from AMD and Intel, buying a CPU has meant signing on for problems that are hard to foresee.

Read more