Skip to main content

AMD Ryzen 6000 tested in a new Zenbook against Intel’s best

Intel’s 12th-gen laptops chips have made quite a leap forward, and we’ve been waiting for AMD’s response. And now, as tested in the new Zenbook S 13 OLED (UM5302), we’ve seen that response — at least partially.

This new Zenbook S 13 features the Ryzen 7 6800U, part of AMD’s new Ryzen 6000 series of chips, packed away inside. These are a low-power variant intended for thin and light laptops and are based on the company’s Zen 3+ architecture.

Recommended Videos

This won’t be a full review of the Zenbook S 13 OLED (that’s coming later), but it’ll be a solid introduction to these chips. The stakes are high against Intel’s 12th-gen chips, and though we’ll need more data to flesh out the comparison, AMD’s new chips are certainly still in the running.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Understanding the lineup

Asus ZenBook S 13 OLED UM5302 front angle view showing display and keyboard deck.
Mark Coppock/Digital Trends

The Ryzen 7 6800U is an 8-core/16-thread chip that runs at a base of 15 watts and is configurable up to to 28 watts. That compares to the 8-core/16-thread Ryzen 7 6800H, which we haven’t tested yet and is a 45-watt part. The Zenbook S 13 OLED presents a challenge for any chip given its thin 0.59-inch chassis — there’s not a lot of room inside for a complex thermal design or large fans. So, I was looking forward to seeing the Ryzen 7 6800U’s performance even when compared with the CPUs in some other, larger laptops.

Other than the Dell XPS 13, the laptops in our comparison group are 14-inch machines or larger. That means they likely offer more space for better thermals, and we should keep that in mind as we consider the Ryzen 7 6800U’s performance in the Zenbook S 13 OLED. I selected these laptops because they feature the AMD chip’s primary competition and its predecessor, the Ryzen 7 5800U. Therefore, these are the machines that provide the best cross-section in our database.

And just what is the Ryzen 7 6800U’s main competition? Well, it’s a little confusing. In the past, Intel had a direct comparison in its U-series chips, which also ran at 15 watts. But now, the lineup is split in three ways: 28-watt P-series chips, 15-watt U-series chips, and 9-watt U-series chips.

Without getting into all the details, it’s fair to compare the Ryzen 7 6800H against the Core i7-1260P. It’s a 12-core (four Performance and eight Efficient), 16-thread CPU running at a base TDP of 28 watts. Intel also has a lower-powered configuration, such as the Core i7-1260U, which is a 10-core (two Performance, eight Efficient), 12-thread version with a base TDP of 9 watts. That’s not a fair comparison, of course, and we haven’t tested it yet.

Testing performance against Intel

Comparing the Ryzen 7 6800U with the Core i7-1260P, we see it falling significantly behind in Geekbench 5 in both single-core and multi-core scores. In fact, it’s not much faster than some last-generation chips, including the Ryzen 7 5800U, the Core i7-11370H, and the Core i7-1185G7.

Geekbench
(single/multi)
Handbrake
(seconds)
Cinebench R23
(single/multi)
PCMark 10
Complete
3DMark
Time Spy
 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
(Ryzen 7 6800U)
1,417 / 6,854 112 1,402 / 8,682 5,647 2,110
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(Core i7-1260P)
1,717 / 9,231 130 1,626 / 7,210 5,760 1,658
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(Core i7-1260P) – Performance mode
1,712 / 10,241 101 1,723 / 8,979 5,816 1,979
Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro
(Core i7-1260P)
1,709 / 9,457 114 1,637 / 8,066 5,585 N/A
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Carbon
(Ryzen 7 5800U)
1,373 / 6,080 125 1,409 / 8,086 5,682 1,308
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro
(Core i7-11370H)
1,578 / 5,957 202 1,514 / 5,544 5,149 1,888
Dell XPS 13
(Core i7-1185G7)
1,549 / 5,431 204 1,399 / 4,585 n/a 1,380

But switching to our Handbrake test that encodes a 420MB video as H.265, it competes far better against the Core i7-1260P chips as tested in the Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro and the Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7. The Lenovo is faster in its performance mode, though that likely has more to do with the laptop itself.

Interestingly, I used the Asus performance tuning utility on the Zenbook S 13 to benchmark in both balanced and performance modes, and there was little difference between them. In the Zenbook, the Ryzen 7 6800U throttles in performance mode in Cinebench R23, quickly hitting the CPU’s maximum temperature of 95 degrees C and dropping down in performance.

Speaking of Cinebench, the Ryzen 7 6800U was again in line with the Core i7-1260P laptops and 13% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800U in the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Carbon. It was significantly faster than the previous-gen Core i7s, of course, which lacked the high core count.

Asus ZenBook S 13 OLED UM5302 rear view showing cover and logo.
Mark Coppock/Digital Trends

In PCMark 10, all the laptops in the comparison group provided similar performance. This benchmark doesn’t put too much pressure on the CPU and represents typical productivity work, meaning the last couple of generations of CPUs have been plenty fast.

Finally, the Ryzen 7 6800U’s integrated Radeon Graphics make a significant jump from last year’s AMD chips, catching up to Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, featured in those Core i7-1260P machines. In fact, it scored slightly higher in 3DMark. Of course, this is still a chip that will power entry-level gaming at low settings best.

Battery life

The Zenbook S 13 OLED packs in a 67 watt-hour battery, which is large for a 13-inch laptop. At the same time, it was built around a 16:10, 2,880 x 1,800 OLED touch display that’s power-hungry. So, it’s always challenging to compare the specific impact of a CPU on battery life with so many other factors involved.

In our web-browsing test that cycles through a series of popular and complex websites, the Zenbook S 13 OLED lasted for just over eight hours. That’s behind the Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen Gen 7 and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Carbon, both with high-res 14-inch IPS displays. Frankly, I expected the Zenbook to last longer in this test. Then, in our video test that loops a local 1080p movie trailer, the Zenbook made it to around 13.5 hours. Both are decent scores, but nothing to write home about.

While we can’t really compare CPU efficiencies with these benchmarks, we can at least conclude that the Ryzen 7 6800U doesn’t stand out in its efficiency. And that’s no surprise, given that it can pull as much power as the Core i7-1260P at its top end.

Web browsing test Video test
 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
(Ryzen 7 6800U)
8 hours, 4 minutes 13 hours, 13 minutes
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(Core i7-1260P)
9 hours, 10 minutes 12 hours, 45 minutes
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Carbon
(Ryzen 7 5800U)
10 hours, 6 minutes 11 hours, 12 minutes
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro
(Core i7-11370H)
7 hours, 43 minutes 12 hours, 46 minutes
Dell XPS 13
(Core i7-1185G7)
6 hours 20 minutes 10 hours, 32 minutes

A lot more to discover

Ultimately, we can’t say anything overly definitive about the Ryzen 7 6800U from these brief tests in the Zenbook S 13 OLED just yet. It’s clearly a powerful chip for compact laptops, though, and it certainly feels competitive with Intel’s latest offerings.

We’ll need to see it perform in larger laptops with more thermal headroom to draw accurate conclusions. But the initial impression is that the Ryzen 7 6800U competes well against Intel’s Core i7-1260P, maintaining AMD’s spot as a viable performance alternative against Intel’s latest.

Mark Coppock
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
I tested AMD’s latest claims about Ryzen 9000, and they don’t hold up
The Ryzen 9 9950X between someone's fingertips.

AMD says that gaming performance on Ryzen 9000 is actually better than what you've read. As you can read in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review, AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs are the best processors you can buy when it comes to productivity. Gaming performance, on the other hand, is disappointing.

According to a new blog post from AMD, there are a few reasons why reviewers saw lower gaming performance than expected. Chief among them are the fact that AMD used an unreleased version of Windows 11 -- the 24H2 update, which is available to Windows Insiders -- and that it used an administrator account for its "automated test methodology." In light of that, I downloaded the Windows update, spun up an admin account, and retested the Ryzen 9 9950X. And I'm not seeing what AMD claims at all.

Read more
I tested the Ryzen 5 9600X against the best budget gaming CPU — here’s the winner
The Ryzen 5 7600X sitting among thermal paste and RAM.

AMD is back with a new budget CPU that's aiming to make it among the best gaming processors. The Ryzen 5 9600X debuts the Zen 5 architecture, and it comes with some performance improvements over last-gen's Ryzen 5 7600X. As you can read in our Ryzen 5 9600X review, however, it's not a slam dunk for AMD's latest.

Big price drops on AMD's last-gen Ryzen 5 7600X have made it a very impressive budget CPU. Although the latest Ryzen 5 9600X is clearly faster across benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7600X stands out with an exceptional value.
By the specs

Read more
AMD’s new Ryzen 9000 CPUs are only cheaper in spirit
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X between two finger tips.

Following up on reviews for the Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X, a flurry of reports are coming out about AMD's pricing for its new Zen 5 CPUs. Across the lineup, which is sure to earn some spots among the best processors, AMD reduced prices compared to the previous generation. That's great. But it's not exactly an accurate picture of pricing right now.

First, the prices. You can see in the picture below the prices for the main four Zen 5 CPUs. Both Ryzen 9 models are $50 cheaper compared to their last-gen counterparts, the Ryzen 7 9700X is $40 cheaper, and the Ryzen 5 9600X is $20 cheaper. That's only true if you compare the list prices that AMD set. Ultimately, it's up to retailers to dictate the final price, which is something we saw in full effect with AMD's last-gen CPUs.

Read more