Skip to main content

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs. Intel Core i9-13900K: a close battle

Intel launched its 13th-generation Raptor Lake processors with the 24-core Core i9-13900K — and on the same day that AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X hit store shelves. The Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X are the flagship offerings of the next generation, and with both arriving so closely, PC builders have a tough choice between AMD or Intel.

Now that the Core i9-13900K is here, we can get an idea about how it holds up to the results we gathered in our Ryzen 9 7950X review. Our results show one thing: The journey to have the best processor of this generation is highly competitive.

Recommended Videos

Pricing and availability

The Ryzen 9 7950X sitting against its box.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

AMD released the Ryzen 9 7950X on the same day Intel announced the Core i9-13900K: September 27, 2022. It retails for $700, and it looks locked at that price for the time being. It’s unlike what we saw with the hugely popular Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which skyrocketed shortly after release before settling down at its list price.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The Core i9-13900K arrived on October 20. Intel is keeping with the same pricing as the Core i9-12900K this generation, with the new part clocking in at $589. That’s a bit of an optimistic price, as the Core i9-12900K regularly sold for around the $620 mark.

Even at that price, though, the Core i9-13900K is much cheaper than the Ryzen 9 7950X. Overall, you’re looking at around $100 less for Intel’s part, maybe $120 at the most. In addition, the Core i9-13900K supports last-gen 600-series motherboards (with a proper BIOS update), and you can use DDR4 memory given you have a DDR4-capable 600-series board. That drives down the total platform cost of the Core i9-13900K a lot compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X.

Specs

Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

On paper, the Core i9-13900K seems to beat the Ryzen 9 7950X into the ground, but there’s a little more to the story. Like the previous generation, the Core i9-13900K combines performance (P) cores and efficient (E) cores. The E-cores aren’t nearly as powerful, so although they raise the core count, they don’t scale performance in the same way.

Ryzen 9 7950X Core i9-13900K
Cores/threads 16/32 24 (8+16)/32
Boost clock speed 5.7GHz 5.8GHz
Base clock speed 4.5GHz 3GHz(P-core), 2.2GHz(E-core)
Cache (L2 + L3) 80MB 68MB
Maximum boost power 230W 253W
Price $700 $590

They certainly help with multitasking, though, which we saw in our Core i9-12900KS review. You get 24 total cores on the Core i9-13900K, split between eight P-cores and 16 E-cores. The Ryzen 9 7950X, meanwhile, comes with 16 cores. Although the Intel chip wins out on overall core count, the E-cores don’t support hyperthreading. That means you’re getting 32 threads on both parts.

The other spec of note is cache. Intel is boosting its cache, likely in response to the gaming prowess of AMD’s 3D V-Cache tech, and you get a total of 68MB split across L2 and L3 cache. AMD still has a slight lead here, though, with the Ryzen 9 7950X coming with 80MB of total cache. AMD focuses that cache more in L3, as the Core i9-13900K has twice the L2 cache as AMD’s part.

Although we can do the spec comparison endlessly, the reality is that the design and architecture are what ultimately determine performance. The only apples-to-apples spec we can compare is power, which is much closer than it used to be. AMD pushed power up to 230W for the platform, edging closer to the 253W limit of the Core i9-13900K.

Performance

We’ve seen a clear performance leader for the past few generations, but that’s not the case now. The Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X are highly competitive, trading blows in most applications. Intel claims a very small lead in single-threaded performance, but the boosted core counts on the Core i9-13900K allow it to handed multithreaded tasks much better.

In applications, the Core i9-13900K tops the charts, but the Ryzen 9 7950X isn’t far behind. In some cases, such as 7-Zip and 3DMark’s Fire Strike test, the Ryzen 9 7950X actually claims the lead. If you want the best performance regardless of the margin, the Core i9-13900K is for you. But you’re giving up very little with the Ryzen 9 7950X.

In games, you’re giving up basically nothing. The Ryzen 9 7950X shows a lead in Far Cry 6, but the Core i9-13900K shows a similar lead in Forza Horizon 4. With how graphically demanding modern games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Cyberpunk 2077 are, many titles show no difference between the two CPUs.

Although there’s generally a clear answer for the best processor, it’s tough this generation. AMD and Intel are trading blows with razor-thin margins, which puts a lot more emphasis on price. Although the Ryzen 9 7950X may win in some applications, it’s also about $100 more expensive than the Core i9-13900K.

Motherboard and socket

Core i9-12900KS processor socketed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends / Digital Trends

The Ryzen 9 7950X marks a big departure for AMD. It only works with the new AM5 socket, putting to rest the AM4 socket AMD has used since 2016. Along with a new motherboard, you’ll also need new DDR5 memory. Unlike the Core i9-13900K, AMD only supports DDR5 on Ryzen 7000 processors.

DDR5 prices are high, but AMD believes they’ll drop soon. Intel is sticking with its approach in the previous generation, offering DDR4 and DDR5 versions of most motherboards. Although the Core i-13900K supports DDR4 and DDR5, you’ll need to buy a motherboard that can fit the memory standard you want to use.

Intel is using the same LGA1700 socket, so if you built a machine with a 12th-gen processor, you should be able to upgrade without buying a new motherboard. Be sure to check the support resources for your particular motherboard, though. You need an updated BIOS on 600-series motherboards before installing the Core i9-13900K.

Although you’ll need more to upgrade to the Ryzen 9 7950X, most people will need to buy a new motherboard regardless of which CPU you choose. Going with DDR4 or reusing some you have could save you some money with the Core i9-13900K, but it depends on what your upgrade plans look like in the future.

Too close to call

Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

This generation, it’s truly too close to call. The Core i9-13900K performs slightly better based on our testing, but it largely depends on the application. And in games, there’s almost no difference in most titles, while some favor AMD and others favor Intel. In short, it’s hard to go wrong with either of these processors, even if there isn’t a clear winner.

For most people, the Core i9-13900K is the better buy. It’s cheaper, and you can reuse a 600-series motherboard and DDR4. The Ryzen 9 7950X is hugely impressive, but with a higher price, expensive motherboards, and DDR5 being your only option, it’s a much more expensive option without a clear performance advantage.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Game developer calls Intel flagship CPUs ‘defective’
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

When it rains, it pours, at least for Intel -- or rather, its customers. As first reported in February, Intel's best CPUs have been crashing for months now, and the uproar that was previously limited to gamers is now spreading like wildfire to data centers and game studios. This time, Alderon Games, the studio behind Path of Titans, made a strong statement about the problem. The studio claims that Intel's 13th and 14th-gen CPUs have a "nearly 100%" failure rate, and as a result, Alderon Games is switching all of its servers to AMD.

Alderon Games didn't mince words in its statement, making it clear that there's something wrong with Intel's latest desktop processors. While mostly associated with consumer PCs, these CPUs are powerful enough to run game servers, too, and the lack of a fix over the last few months has become a problem for the company. Matthew Cassells, the founder of Alderon Games, mentioned issues such as crashes, instability, and corrupted SSDs and memory, with all of them only occurring on Intel's 13th and 14th-gen CPUs. Installing new BIOS and firmware updates didn't solve the problem.

Read more
Game dev on Intel’s unstable CPUs: ‘I might lose over $100K’
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

Intel's best processors have been crashing for months, and despite many attempts, the issue is nowhere near being fixed. In fact, the impact might be far worse than we thought.

Original reports about stability issues with the Core i9-13900K and the Core i9-14900K came from PC gamers, but now, we're hearing that they're crashing in servers, too. That can lead to serious damage, with one game dev estimating the instability may cost them up to $100K in lost players.

Read more
AMD didn’t even need its best CPU to beat Intel
A render of a Ryzen 9000 CPU.

Looks like the competition between AMD and Intel is about to start heating up again. AMD's upcoming second-best processor, the Ryzen 9 9900X, was just spotted in an early benchmark -- and the results are shockingly good. If this is what AMD can do with a 12-core CPU, what's going to happen when the 16-core version of Zen 5 appears in tests?

The happy news (for AMD fans, at least) comes directly from the Geekbench 6.2 database, and it all comes down to a benchmark of what appears to be a retail sample of the Ryzen 9 9900X. The chip scored an impressive 3,401 points in the single-core score, and 19,756 points in the multi-core score. That puts it far above its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7900X, but that's not its only success.

Read more