Skip to main content

AMD just won the core wars, and it still has a trump card up its sleeve

AMD embarasses Intel with Threadripper 3000, even without its 64-core flagship

Mission accomplished. The long road to dominance that AMD started on with the launch of its first-generation Ryzen processors has finally reached its conclusion, with AMD sitting atop the pile. Its new-generation of Threadripper CPUs is here, launching on the very same day as Intel’s lukewarm, 10th-generation Cascade Lake chips. The difference is stark. So stark, in fact, that Intel may take years to recover and AMD isn’t even done yet.

AMD has been on a tear for the past two years, delivering major improvements in both its CPU and GPU divisions. But where it’s really shone is in returning us to a processor development cycle that delivers serious performance enhancements year on year. In 2019, it’s done so once again, this time upping the ante in ways we haven’t seen the red team do since its Athlon 64 days.

Digital Trends

With Ryzen 3000 we saw a 15% increase in instructions per clock, finally bringing mainstream AMD CPUs within a hair’s breadth of Intel’s single-threaded performance. Combined with boosted clock speeds and better memory latency, Ryzen 3000 chips offer better bang for buck in almost the entire product stack.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

But as with the first-generation Ryzen CPUs, AMD’s big win in 2019 was heralded by a further advancement into higher-core counts. Where Zen CPUs taught us that six cores was perfectly viable for mid-tier processors, and eight cores were to be expected at the top, Zen 2 took us one step further.

Mainstream CPUs under $500 now offer up to 12-cores. Move those goalposts up to $750 and there are 16-core chips available, with the same, strong single-threaded performance to boot.

While Threadripper 3000 has yet to push the core-count boundaries beyond what we saw with the second-generation, it has delivered something that just wasn’t possible before: a CPU that has both huge core counts and strong single-threaded performance too.

The new 3960X and 3970X CPUs have 24 and 32-cores a piece, with double the number of supporting threads thanks to simultaneous multithreading. Just take a look at some of the results from the likes of Anandtech, PCWorld, or KitGuruTech. They are embarrassing for Intel. Its brand new, 18-core, 10980XE get absolutely destroyed by the new CPUs.  Even the $3,000, server-grade Xeon W-3175X part, with its 28 cores, is no match for AMD’s new best. And that’s not even the best the red team has planned.

On the very same day where its up-to-32-core Threadripper 3000 CPUs pulled the rug out from Intel, AMD officially announced the impending arrival of its 3990X. A 64-core, 128-thread HEDT processor that should deliver performance far in excess of what even the 3970X is capable of. Set to debut in January, the 3990X will be the most powerful CPU outside of AMD’s own Epyc server line of CPUs, and it will likely challenge them too.

We don’t yet know what the 3990X will cost — though $3,000 seems like a good ballpark guess. But at this point, AMD can effectively set its own standards. The 9900KS might hold on to a slim margin in pure gaming tests, but if you do anything else on your PC, buying Intel’s long-in-the-tooth 14nm hardware feels like a dead-end.

The only question now is whether AMD can keep up with demand. It’s going to be high.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D may not give Intel any breathing room
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.

The competition between Intel Arrow Lake and AMD Zen 5 hasn't been as fierce as usual, with both lineups delivering small gen-to-gen improvements. However, it seems that AMD may soon add a staple to its list of the best processors, and the CPU might be announced at the worst possible time for Intel. I'm talking about the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which now has a rumored release date alongside some performance benchmarks.

The release date speculation was initially shared on Bilibili, but the user has since deleted their post. However, the discussion continued on Chiphell forums, spilling the beans on both the official announcement date and the possible release date.

Read more
AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs just got a lot faster
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X installed in a motherboard.

AMD just announced that some of its best processors are about to become even better. The company unveiled a number of Ryzen 9000 improvements, ranging from a much higher TDP for some of the CPUs to the core-to-core latency improvements we've already heard about. AMD is also now supporting higher-clocked DDR5 RAM, and that's not even all of today's announcements.

The latest BIOS update, named AGESA PI 1.2.0.2, brings a few things, but if you ask me, the biggest change is that AMD is increasing the thermal design power (TDP) of two of its CPUs.

Read more
AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D might show up sooner than expected
AMD CEO holding 3D V-Cache CPU.

AMD might be moving on 3D V-Cache versions of its Ryzen 9000 CPUs faster than expected. According to a leaker on the Chiphell forums, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which could be among the best processors when it releases, might arrive as soon as next month.

VideoCardz dug up the news, which started on the Chiphell forums. The leaker goes by the name zhangzhonhao, but VideoCardz notes that they went under a different alias previously, and that they have a long history of leaking company road maps. The forum post claims AMD will release the Ryzen 7 9800X3D at the end of October, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D will arrive later. The leaker suspects they'll show up in early 2025 with "some new features."

Read more