Skip to main content

American Bar Association says that suing file sharers is an exercise in futility

lsu to begin punishing fining students who pirate stuff piracy bay the
Image used with permission by copyright holder
You can now count the American Bar Association among the organizations which argues that rights holders shouldn’t sue file sharers, according to TorrentFreak.

The ABA released a 113 page document entitled “A Call for Action for Online Piracy and Counterfeiting Legislation.” In it, the ABA argues that in the long run, a significant amount of such lawsuits end up costing more money than they recover from file sharers. On top of that, the ABA also contends that these kinds of lawsuits could be bad PR for the right holders that pursue legal action against copyright violators.

Recommended Videos

Because of these, and other reasons, the American Bar Association states that it “does not believe that legislative action directly targeting consumers would prove effective in reducing piracy or counterfeiting at this time.”

Instead, the efforts to target individuals who share files illegally should instead be redirected towards Web sites and services that facilitate such behavior, including the Pirate Bay and Russian social network VKontakte, the document argues.

“Authorities might need the flexibility to address either the centralized linking site or, should that site be transient, a long list of small third-party hosted sites that cause collective damage,” the ABA’s white paper says.

The ABA says that according to “various government and private sector experts, that intellectual property thefts cost the U.S. economy over $100 billion per year.”

With that number in mind, it will be interesting to see whether the ABA’s call for action will push the U.S. government to make any moves which address this issue.

You can read “A Call for Action for Online Piracy and Counterfeiting Legislation” in full here.

Topics
Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more