Skip to main content

Assange says Wikileaks desperate for money

Julian Assange, October 2011
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Wikileaks has drawn a storm of criticism from governments (particularly the U.S. government) and corporations around the world for publishing classified information about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, corporate malfeasance, and other sensitive topics—and, as a result, found itself cut off from its major sources of funding as institutions like MasterCard, Visa, PayPal, Western Union, and Bank of America refused to handle payments for the organization. Now, that financial “blockade” is taking its toll: Wikileaks has temporarily suspended publishing new information to work on bringing in money, and founder Julian Assange says the organization could shut down by the end of the year.

“These politicized companies believe they have the right to stop you voting with your wallet,” Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said in a video statement. “We have decided to throw all our efforts into fighting these corrupt financial institutions.”

Recommended Videos

Assange says WikiLeaks’ network is stronger than ever and has endured cyberattacks it believes are fueled by governments and corporations eager to suppress the thousands of “revelations” Wikileaks has ready to go. But operating Wikileaks takes effort and money: Wikileaks breaks out its expenses as $300,000 each for security and campaigns, $400,000 for productions, $500,000 each for for technical information, publications research, and staff salaries…and $1.2 million in legal expenses.

Many U.S.-based financial service companies—and tech firms like Amazon—stopped doing business with Wikileaks when it published some quarter million U.S. State Department diplomatic cables last year. According to Wikileaks, the move managed to cut off some 95 percent of its funding. Wikileaks has struggled to open up alternative methods of collecting donations through payment processors in Iceland and elsewhere, but has met with limited success. Wikileaks has been feeling the pressure of its reduced income: last month Assange railed against publisher Canongate over a book deal, noting that his financial situation prevented him from taking action against them.

Assange and Wikileaks still face legal pressure in Europe and the United States. The U.S. Justice Department has been working on a case against Assange and Wikileaks regarding the publication of diplomatic materials, and Assange is still facing possible extradition to Sweden to face sex crime allegations. A decision on his extradition is expected in a few weeks.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more
M4 vs. M3: How much better are Apple’s latest chips?
An official rendering of the Apple M4 chip.

Apple has begun outfitting its Macs with the M4 chip, following the chip’s debut in the iPad Pro in spring 2024. But not every Mac comes with the M4 -- several are still sporting the previous-generation M3, which offers impressive performance in its own right. These devices are expected to make the switch over the coming months.

That means there’s a split between M3 Macs and their M4 siblings, and the big question is whether you should upgrade. Is the M4 a large upgrade over the M3, or will you be fine sticking with the older chip? What sort of performance do the M3 and M4 offer, and how do they work under the hood? We’ve analyzed all the similarities and differences so that you know exactly what you should buy.
Where can you find these chips?

Read more