AT&T also launching gigabit Internet network in Austin, totally not copying Google

By Meghan McDonough April 10, 2013

att_dt — Image used with permission by copyright holder

The people of Austin, Texas must be flattered with all the attention they’re getting lately. First Google announced that it will build its next Google Fiber network there, and now AT&T has gone and said that it will also build a gigabit Internet network in Austin. According to CNET, AT&T hasn’t announced when the service will be rolled out to Austinites, but we’re guessing the company will push for it to rollout around the same time that Google’s Fiber service makes its debut in mid-2014.

AT&T’s renewed focus on network infrastructure is part of its Project VIP which was announced last November. Project Velocity IP is a three-year, $14 billion endeavor that is meant to expand the company’s 4G LTE network, build fiber-optic networks, and add faster service and increase U-Verse availability. While it’s likely the company was already planning to bring superfast fiber-optic Internet service to the good people of Austin, yesterday’s announcement by Google certainly pushed AT&T’s plans into overdrive.

Recommended Videos

Austin’s an interesting choice for the first fiber wars to happen. Not only is it the capital of Texas and home to the University of Texas, it’s also the home of the South By Southwest Film, Interactive, and Music festival. The Interactive part of the fest has grown exponentially in the last few years and has helped the city become a hub for tech companies and start-ups. Plus, with Dell located in Round Rock, a suburb of Austin, the town has had tech running in its veins for a while now.

The wooing of Austin is something we could see repeated in the next few years as both companies build up their infrastructure around the country. It is certainly nice for consumers to have a choice when it comes to Internet service providers and we hope that it’ll stir up a price war and drive the cost of superfast Internet down for everyone.

Topics

AT&T

Meghan McDonough

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Meghan J. McDonough is a Chicago-based purveyor of consumer technology and music. She previously wrote for LAPTOP Magazine…

Computing

We just got our first hint of the RTX 6090, but it’s not what you think

A hand grabbing MSI's RTX 4090 Suprim X.

As we're all counting down the days to a possible announcement of Nvidia's RTX 50-series, GPU brands are already looking ahead to what comes next. A new trademark filing with the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC) reveals just how far ahead some manufacturers are thinking, because it mentions not just the Nvidia RTX 5090, but also an RTX 5090 Ti; there's even an RTX 6090 Ti. Still, it'll be a long while before we can count the RTX 60-series among the best graphics cards, so what is this all about?

The trademark registration filing, first spotted by harukaze5719 on X (formerly Twitter) and shared by VideoCardz, comes from a company called Sinotex International Industrial Ltd. This company is responsible for the GPU brand Ninja, which doesn't have much of a market presence in the U.S.

Computing

How the Blue Screen of Death became your PC’s grim reaper

The Blue Screen of Death seen on a laptop.

There's nothing more startling than your PC suddenly locking up and crashing to a Blue Screen of Death. Otherwise known as a Blue Screen, BSOD, or within the walls of Microsoft, a bug check screen, the Blue Screen of Death is as iconic as it is infamous. Blue Screen of Death is not a proper noun, but I'm going to treat it like one. It's what you were met with during crashes on Intel's 14th-gen CPUs, and it littered airport terminals during the recent CrowdStrike outage.

Everyone knows that a Blue Screen is bad news -- tack on "of Death" to that, and the point is only clearer. It's a sign that something catastrophic has happened, so much so that the operating system can't recover, and it needs to reboot your PC in order to save it. The Blue Screen of Death we know today, fit with its frowning emoticon, is a relatively new development in the history of Windows.

Computing

The performance downgrade made to the M4 Pro that no one is talking about

Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.

I've spent this whole week testing the new M4 chip, specifically the M4 Pro in both the Mac mini and 16-inch MacBook Pro. They are fantastic, impressive chips, but in my testing, I noticed something pretty surprising about the way they run that I haven't seen others talk much about. I'm talking about the pretty significant change Apple made in this generation to power modes.

First off, Apple has extended the different power modes to the "Pro" level chips for the first time, having kept it as an exclusive for Max in the past. The three power modes, found in System Settings, are the following: Low Power, Automatic, and High Power. The interesting thing, however, is that in my testing, the Low Power drops performance far more this time around.