Skip to main content

Cheap Shot or Chip Shot? Nvidia Ponders x86 CPUs

Cheap Shot or Chip Shot? Nvidia Ponders x86 CPUs

At an investars’ conference this week, Nvidia sales VP Mike Hara indicated the company is considering developing its own line of x86 CPUs within the next two years, specifically with an eye towards low-cost PCs and mobile devices. Although speculation that Nvidia might get into the CPU business has surfaced a few times since at least 2005, Hara’s comments are the first acknowledgment by the company that it is, in fact, eyeing the CPU space.

If Nvidia were to develop its own line of x86 CPUs, it would put the company in even more direct competition with rival Intel, which whom it already has a testy relationship. Intel has recently sued Nvidia over terms of a chip licensing agreement, and Nvidia executives have been very publicly denigrating Intel’s integrated graphics solutions—even going so far as to roll out their own Ion platform to replace Intel’s integrated graphics on Atom processors.

Recommended Videos

Nvidia’s focus on the low-end and mobile markets makes sense, even though netbooks and some other mobile computing products carry notoriously low margins. As Intel and other chipmakers evolve their mobile and low-end CPU platforms, they will logically integrate graphics controllers directly into their CPUs to improve performance and reduce manufacturing costs, effectively shutting a third party maker like Nvidia out of the market. By developing its own x86 CPU, Nvidia can offer a competing solution and bring its graphics know-how to bear.

Intel’s recent announcement that it will be outsourcing production of some of its Atom processors to TSMC may also be an indicator of Nvidia’s strategy with its own processor: Nvidia is also a TSMC customer; in theory, if they used TSMC to manufacturer their own x86 solutions, they would at least have production process parity with Intel’s own products.

Of course, Nvidia’s not-really-an-announcement could also be a move in the wider posturing between Nvidia and Intel, perhaps to put more pressure on Intel to engineer future products so mobile device makers can have a selection of graphics options—including third party GPUs.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs. Ryzen 7 5800X: Battle of gaming CPUs
AMD CEO holding 3D V-Cache CPU.

AMD lifted the curtain on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in January, making the bold claim that it was the "world's fastest gaming processor." It's a big statement for a chip that, under the hood, is the same as the Ryzen 7 5800X -- a processor that launched a year and a half ago.

A special bit of tech called 3D V-Cache is what helps the Ryzen 7 5800X3D stand apart, and it could catapult the chip to the top of our best CPU list. The older Ryzen 7 5800X still has some advantages, though. Here's how the two CPUs stack up.
Specs

Read more
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D just beat one of Intel’s best gaming CPUs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D box.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D was just tested in a gaming setting, and this time around, the results were positive: It managed to beat Intel Core i9-12900K by over 21%.

Previously, only synthetic benchmarks of the processor have been leaked. In those tests, the CPU failed to impress with its scores.

Read more
Intel Core i5 12400F vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Affordable CPUs, compared
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x pins.

As exciting as the new Intel Alder Lake 12600K and 12900K CPUs are, most gamers don't need anything quite so powerful. The more affordable Core-i5 models are likely to be the standouts of their generation, which is why the debut of the Core i5-12400F is so exciting. This more economical, six-core processor is designed to go head to head with AMD's Ryzen 5600X hexacore design, with a much lower price tag.

Here's how they stack in a battle of the best bang for buck gaming CPUs in early 2022.
Specs

Read more