Skip to main content

Chrome 50 beta update gets pushy with new notification improvements

chrome beta 50 update pushnotes
Image used with permission by copyright holder
It’s that time again, early adopters. Chrome has a new beta version out — quite a milestone, in fact — and it brings with it a couple of useful improvements to push notifications, and the introduction of declarative pre-load. Neither are revolutionary, but if you like being on the cutting edge of browser updates, this is one you’ll want to download.

Push notification improvements are likely to be considered the biggest of the changes this time around, and they affect the way the notifications are handled. Previously, they relied on service workers to proactively grab information from a server, in order to then disseminate that among users who wished to receive the notifications.

Recommended Videos

This caused issues when network connectivity wasn’t strong, or there was interference from other messages. Moving forward, notification data is embedded with push messages, cutting back on the amount of information being sent at regular intervals. All of it is encrypted to ensure security remains tight, but it should mean that users are less effected by spotty coverage.

On top of that, site owners will now be able to tell when a user has closed a notification, which allows them to implement a system that dismisses those messages on all platforms — making for a better end-user experience.

There’s also an option to support custom icons on push notifications now, giving us big eyed cats like the image above, or anything else the designer can think of.

The other big change with this beta update is declarative pre-load, which lets site designers pre-load resources that are required by different aspects of the design. In Google’s blog cited example, if a Web page required the loading of a particular style sheet, it may need to wait for a JavaScript to run first, before that style sheet can be loaded, slowing page load times.

Side-by-side comparison using link rel='preload'

In the future, Web designers can call for resources before anything has loaded, which should make for a faster browsing experience for everyone.

Available now for Android, Chrome OS, Linux, Mac, and Windows, the beta update 50 can be downloaded from the usual channels.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more