Skip to main content

Comcast exec thinks there’s little demand for Google Fiber level speed

comcast
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Published in the Philadelphia Inquirer recently, Comcast executive vice president David L. Cohen wrote an editorial in which he claims customers simply aren’t ready to handle gigabit networks like Google Fiber. Specifically, Cohen claims most American homes don’t have the hardware to take advantage of the increased speed. In addition, Cohen states the majority of websites simply can’t deliver content at the speed available on current broadband networks. Assuming demand becomes sizable enough for Cohen and Comcast to actually take notice, he states “a competitive marketplace of wired and wireless broadband providers will be ready to serve it.”

broadband-5The majority of the editorial sings the praises of America’s existing broadband network and discounts critics that are seeking faster Internet speeds. For instance, Cohen praises overall coverage around the United States as well as affordability of monthly service and broadband speed increases over the past six years.

Recommended Videos

Cohen also credited broadband providers for the success of companies like “Google, Facebook, Apple, Twitter and Pandora” and praised mobile broadband providers for getting 4G LTE networks up and running.

However, Cohen did not mention the poor reputation issue plaguing companies like Comcast, Time Warner and other broadband providers. According to the most recent Harris Interactive summary report, Comcast ranks “poor” on the 2013 reputation chart; specifically gauged by the general public. In fact, Comcast has been rated poor for the last two years and companies like Time Warner and Verizon Communications also rank low on the list. Alternatively, Google has ranked in the top five for the last few years.

Comcast and other broadband providers also continue to have an issue with raising speeds for customers around the nation. The most recent version of Netflix’s ISP speed index places Google Fiber at the top of the list with an average speed of 3.41Mbps. Alternatively, Comcast has fallen from fourth place to eighth place on the list since the start of the year and averaged just over 2Mbps each month.

Topics
Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more