Skip to main content

Comcast: industry has “consensus” on net neutrality

Comcast Logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Speaking at a Brooking’s Institute Internet Governance and Regulation panel, Comcast Vice President David Cohen delivered a keynote address in which he pronounced a “consensus” has been reached on the thorny topic of net neutrality: rather than intrusive government regulation mandating what ISPs may or may not do, net neutrality should be considered an engineering problem to be managed by the groups like the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and the brand-new Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group—of which Comcast is proud to be a charter member.

“The Internet is too big and too important for government to ignore, and it is too complex and too dynamic for government to regulate intrusively,” Cohen concluded. “Let’s learn from the Internet itself. It’s flourishing as a self-governing, self-healing ecosystem. And the more we can take advantage of that model, coupled with reasonable consensus-based regulation, the better we will be and the better the Internet will be.”

Recommended Videos

Comcast occupies a unique position in the network neutrality debate. Comcast is not only the largest ISP in the United States, it’s also the only ISP to have been sanctioned by the FCC for blocking P2P file sharing applications. However, earlier this year, Comcast’s appeal of that case managed to eviscerate the legal basis the FCC’s regulation of the Internet. As such, U.S. Internet users have had essentially no protection from ISPs managing traffic however they like, whether that be blocking specific applications and services, promoting partners, or deciding what devices consumers may or may not use to access the Internet.

The FCC has been trying to hammer out a new basis for a network neutrality frameworks; however, those efforts were recently hamstrung by Google and Verizon putting forth a policy proposal that would essentially enshrine the FCC’s previous net neutrality framework and create transparency requirements…but leave the mobile Internet market unregulated.

Cohen argues that, since the brouhaha over its selectively shutting down P2P file sharing apps “very little has been said about our networking management practices.” Cohen says that’s not because Comcast has stopped managing its network, but because “issues are worked out by the engineers in real time as they should be.” Cohen says Comcast has taken its new networking management practices to the IETF, and openly shared the results of its network management testing. “Our collective experience convinced us that we would all benefit from a U.S.-focused body modeled on the IETF. An engineering-based, independent organization devoted to Internet technical issues, including issues surrounding network management.”

Many consumer advocates would probably disagree with Cohen’s assertion that a “consensus” has been reached on network neutrality, and that Comcast’s own behavior with the P2P blocking instances—first denying they were blocking anything, then arguing the FCC didn’t have authority to make them carry traffic neutrally—illustrates the need for federal regulation. Cohen argues that with transparency of network management practices, consumers will demand changes in company policies that they dislike. But with many broadband ISPs operating as municipal monopolies and no governmental authority mandating operational transparency, many consumers might have trouble taking ISPs at their word they’re doing everything on the up-and-up.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more