Skip to main content

Don’t think consoles have changed the requirements of PC games? Have a look for yourself

consoles have changed pc requirements assassins creed unity ww2 machinegun 1415412327
For better or worse, new cross-platform titles like Assassin's Creed: Unity put aging PC hardware to the test Image used with permission by copyright holder
The controversy surrounding my article about how consoles have increased system requirements in PC games exceeded anything I could have predicted. My claim was simple; if you have a system that’s getting on in years, such as one with a dual-core processor and/or a video card with 2GB of VRAM or less, some of the newest cross-platform games will challenge your rig. PC gamers are no longer guaranteed the flawless experience they’ve become accustomed to with previous cross-platform ports.

This assertion is indisputably supported by the facts. While I could write a separate benchmark post, there’s really no need, as other reputable sites have already tested these games more extensively than I could.

Sites that back up my claims include:

And so on.

Recommended Videos

Of these high-profile holiday blockbusters only Advanced Warfare runs alright on older systems, though it too chokes on mid-range mobile GPUs that are a couple generations old. The others demand recent hardware. Anandtech found that even the AMD Radeon R9 280 barely hits 30FPS at medium detail and 1080p resolution in Assassin’s Creed: Unity while Notebookcheck.net found Dragon Age: Inquisition won’t exceed 30FPS at 1080p and high detail on anything less than a GTX 770M paired with an Intel mobile quad.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The end of the last console generation created an environment where even low-end hardware could handle any port at 30FPS and 720p resolution (the maximum typical of the last-gen consoles). Playing at 1080p was usually no sweat, even at maximum or near-maximum detail. That era is over. Going forward, PC gamers will need more powerful hardware to obtain the performance they’re accustomed to seeing. This situation will likely continue for several years.

These findings are not the same as declaring PCs are less powerful or can’t handle games, a statement many commenters put in my mouth. It’s clear that a powerful computer is faster than any console. But, as highlighted by the Steam hardware survey, not everyone can afford a powerful computer. For those on a budget the change in typical system requirements is meaningful.

And this is not an unusual turn of events. The same trend occurred with the release of the Xbox 360/PS3. It’s more relevant now, though, because cross-platform releases have become the rule rather than an exception. While some might contend the change has nothing to do with consoles, that’s a hard claim to take seriously given the sudden leap has occurred just after the release of new console hardware, and the lack of any innovation on the PC side that would spur such advancement.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
This app promises to prevent OLED burn-in, but don’t fall for it
An OLED display with burn-in.

If you want to strike fear into the heart of any OLED monitor owner, just mention "burn-in." Although OLED displays have quickly infiltrated the ranks of the best gaming monitors, burn-in remains the key concern for adopting the display tech. A new app, called OLED Guard Pro, says it can prevent burn-in, resulting in "longer screen life, reduced power bills, and a viewing experience that feels fresh every day."

I use an OLED monitor daily, my trusty KTC G42P5, so I downloaded OLED Guard Pro to see if it would finally put my admittedly small burn-in fears to rest. And although the app works mostly as advertised, I'm skeptical that it will actually prevent image retention in the way the app claims.
Meet OLED Guard Pro

Read more
Don’t waste your money on an OLED gaming monitor
Cyberpunk 2077 running on an OLED gaming monitor.

OLED monitors are a waste of money, which is a shocking statement coming from the guy who packed the list of the best gaming monitors with OLED options. I love an OLED gaming monitor and the experience it can provide, don't misunderstand me. For the vast majority of gamers, however, they're simply too expensive to justify right now.

Since the release of the LG UltraGear OLED 27, we've seen a flurry of new gaming monitors sporting the latest and greatest panel tech. Each new release pushes the envelope further. Although we're a few years separated from when the first OLED gaming monitors showed up, this display tech is still in its early adopter stage.
You're literally wasting money

Read more
I tested AMD’s latest claims about Ryzen 9000, and they don’t hold up
The Ryzen 9 9950X between someone's fingertips.

AMD says that gaming performance on Ryzen 9000 is actually better than what you've read. As you can read in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review, AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs are the best processors you can buy when it comes to productivity. Gaming performance, on the other hand, is disappointing.

According to a new blog post from AMD, there are a few reasons why reviewers saw lower gaming performance than expected. Chief among them are the fact that AMD used an unreleased version of Windows 11 -- the 24H2 update, which is available to Windows Insiders -- and that it used an administrator account for its "automated test methodology." In light of that, I downloaded the Windows update, spun up an admin account, and retested the Ryzen 9 9950X. And I'm not seeing what AMD claims at all.

Read more