Skip to main content

‘Creepy’ app threatens the privacy of social network users

A new app fittingly called Creepy is making waves in privacy circles for its creative use of social networks to achieve an unsettling result. The app, actually a software package for Windows and Linux, hooks into social networks like Twitter and Flickr to glean information about a targeted user’s location. It’s surprisingly effective, even in its early stages, according to the UK-based blog Tinq.

Would-be stalkers need only to enter a Twitter, Foursquare or Flickr username and Creepy will use the service’s APIs to access whatever photos or tweets have been published to the targeted account. Creepy then analyzes the information and delivers a report to the user.

Recommended Videos

While Twitter’s geo-tagging feature is turned off by default, photos taken with a smartphone and uploaded through services like Twitpic and YFrog contain geographical information embedded in EXIF data. Social network users often aren’t aware that the geographical data is contained in their shared images, and even if they are aware, they probably don’t expect an app like Creepy to come along and extract it without their consent.

After Creepy has finished its analysis, it reveals a map that pinpoints the location where the targeted user posted every geo-tagged tweet and every shared image. Clusters would logically indicate a person’s residence or workplace — vital information to a stalker.

Yiannis Kakavas, the 26 year old creator of Creepy, acknowledges the program’s high level of, er, creepiness, but insists that it is meant to raise awareness about the privacy issues surrounding geo-location aware social networking sites.

“Users should be educated and warned about the risks before they choose to use any location aware service,” Kakavas said in an interview with Tinq. “It’s a constant fight between our right to be ‘left alone’ and our need for exhibitionism. Let’s see which one wins.”

Creepy is currently available to download for Windows and Linux operating systems and a version for Mac OS X is in the works.

Aemon Malone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more