Skip to main content

The FCC votes to subsidize broadband for Americans living near the poverty line

FCC Tom Wheeler Net Neutrality
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
The US Federal Communcations Comission (FCC) will soon vote on a plan that gives $9.25 a month to low-income Americans, so they can afford Internet access. The proposal is an update for the Lifeline program, which since 1985 has offered subsidized phone service to Americans living at or near the poverty line.

The FCC is arguing that Internet access isn’t a luxury in 2016: it’s essential for everything from finding employment to finishing homework assignments. This leaves 64.5 million Americans, who can’t afford broadband, at a disadvantage.

Recommended Videos

“Internet access has become a prerequisite for full participation in our economy and our society, but nearly one in five Americans is still not benefiting from the opportunities made possible by the most powerful and pervasive platform in history,” wrote FCC chairman Tom Wheeler in a blog post.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The Lifeline program is funded by surcharges on phone lines, and currently provides subsidized landlines and mobile phone service. 39.7 million households qualify for Lifeline, meaning not all of the 64.5 million Americans without broadband access would qualify for the program.

Whatever the numbers, Wheeler says that access to broadband is as essential to living now as phone service was in the 1980s.

“We must never lose sight of the fact that what we’re really talking about is people,” wrote Wheeler. “Unemployed workers who miss out on jobs that are only listed online, students who go to fast-food restaurants to use the Wi-Fi hotspots to do homework, veterans who are unable to apply for their hard-earned benefits, seniors who can’t look up health information when they get sick.”

The $9.25 offered by the program would be almost enough to pay for discount Internet access provided by some companies. For example, Comcast offers the 10Mbps Internet Essentials program to qualifying people for $9.95 a month, just a little more than the $9.25 subsidy.

On March 31, the FCC voted in favor of the plan, which will thereby increase spending on Lifelife from $1.5 billion a year to $2.25 billion, adjusted for inflation. The vote resulted in a 3-2 outcome, with Democrats sanctioning the plan and Republicans objecting. Republican Commissioner Ajit Pai claimed that a 5-0 vote would have occurred had Democratic Commissioner Mignon Clyburn not withdrawn.

Consumer advocates and trade groups representing ISPs commended the commission’s decision, with USTelecom stating that the Lifeline plan “will help to bring the transformative benefits of the Internet to millions of low-income Americans.” Meanwhile, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association claimed that the vote “takes important steps to help even more Americans adopt broadband at home.”

The broadband subsidy proposal was only half the news from today, though. A second proposal was also approved, allowing Internet users to untick some of that pesky monitoring and web usage monetization Internet providers are notorious for. ISPs are obviously unhappy with this arrangement.

Updated on 03-31-2016 by Gabe Carey: Amended to reflect voting outcomes and resulting government insights.

Article originally published on 03-08-2016.

Justin Pot
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Justin's always had a passion for trying out new software, asking questions, and explaining things – tech journalism is the…
This breakthrough holographic display could make AR glasses a reality in 2026
A simulated view of Swave-powered AR glasses.

Consumer AR glasses could soon become a reality thanks to a breakthrough holographic chip from Swave. Lightweight, low-power, affordable AR glasses have thus far been a distant dream.

The best smart glasses can display massive virtual screens but require a phone or other device for video and power. The buzz around AR glasses has been growing, spurred by an impressive Meta Orion prototype demonstration and the powerful new Snap Spectacles update. However, we’re still waiting for comfortable, affordable glasses that display bright, crisp images over a wide field of view.
Swave’s HXR display
Swave's laser-powered holographic display engine is compact and lightweight Swave

Read more
This HP ProBook laptop is normally $1,876 — today it’s $769
The HP ProBook 445 laptop on a white background.

If you're on the lookout for laptop deals because you need a device for a work-from-home job or to run a small business, you should check out this offer for the HP ProBook 445. Originally sold for $1,876, this dependable machine is down to just $769, for savings of $1,107. We're not sure how long stocks will last though, as a 59% discount for a powerful laptop will surely attract a lot of attention. If you don't want to miss out on this bargain, you'll need to complete your purchase as soon as possible.

Why you should buy the HP ProBook 445 laptop
HP is firmly in our list of the best laptop brands, and the HP ProBook 445 showcases its reputation for reliable devices with modern designs. The device is powered by the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U processor and AMD Radeon 660M Graphics, along with 16GB of RAM that's only found in top-tier machines, according to our guide on how much RAM do you need. You won't have any trouble in carrying out your daily workload with these specifications, especially with the advanced features that you can access with Windows 11 Pro that's pre-installed in this laptop's 512GB SSD. Don't worry -- you'll still have enough storage space for your apps and files.

Read more
Thomson Reuters lands copyright win against AI company. What’s next?
Thomson Reuters website as seen on an iPhone 16 Pro.

The first landmark win in an AI copyright case is here. A Delaware court has ruled that a tech startup used copyright-protected material to build a competing AI-based legal product, which is against the law, handing over a remarkable win to Thomson Reuters.

This is the first major victory for a plaintiff fighting against an AI company over what constitutes “fair use” of material owned by another entity. The parent company of the Reuters news agency has been tangled in a lengthy legal case against Ross Intelligence, an AI company that lifted material from Thomson Reuters’s Westlaw platform.

Read more