Skip to main content

Google, Apple top ‘most desirable employers’ list

google-headquarters-office
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Nearly one in four professionals want to work at Google, according to a newly released study from consulting firm Universum, which helps companies make themselves more attractive to potential employees.

When asked to pick their ideal employers out of a list of 150 companies, 24.79 percent of respondents chose Google as their top pick. Apple came in second, with 13.45 percent.

Recommended Videos

The survey questioned 10,306 young professionals (college graduates with one to eight years of experience) to choose the top five companies for which they’d most like to work.

Facebook, not included on the list, was the top write-in choice, followed by the US Department of Homeland Security, and the United Nations, reports the Wall Street Journal.

Other technology companies that made it into the top 10 most desirable employers include Amazon at No. 5 and Microsoft at No. 7.

Some tech brands didn’t rank as well. Like Qualcomm, for instance, which tied for number 132 with widely hated factory farm corporation Monsanto.

(To see the full list, click here.)

According to Universum project manager Kasia Do, who spoke with the Wall Street Journal, professionals chose companies that they liked as consumers, as well as employers that seem to offer financial stability, like government agencies.

That Google came in first is like unsurprising for many, as the company’s employee perks are widely known. In addition to the YouTube channels and Twitter feeds that shed light on life behind Google’s multi-colored doors, the company also holds open house events and “tech-related talks” to help woo potential employees. And, as anyone who’s been to one of Google’s offices knows, the place is sweet.

Of course, wanting to work for Google, and actually being able to get hired are two entirely different beasts. The company is notoriously scrupulous in its hiring. And even candidates with top-notch credentials can find themselves on the cutting room floor. But don’t worry, young professional, it’s still OK to dream.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Apple’s M3 Max appears to keep up with Intel’s top desktop CPU
Apple revealing the M3 Max processor.

The first benchmarks of Apple's M3 Max processor just leaked, and it looks like it's going to be one speedy chip. Found in the new 16-inch MacBook Pro, the M3 Max pushes the capabilities of Apple silicon to new heights -- so much so that it can keep up with Intel's best desktop processor, all the while consuming far less power.

The exciting results come from a Geekbench 6 test. The chip listed under Apple M3 Max scored 2,943 in single-core and 21,084 in multi-core tests, respectively. Those are numbers that used to be pretty unreachable for a thin and light laptop just a couple of years ago, but they're comparable to Apple's M2 Ultra found in the latest Mac Pro (21,182 multi-core) and Mac Studio (21.316 multi-core).

Read more
15 years ago, Apple killed one of its most beautiful designs
An Apple iSight webcam mounted on a computer monitor.

Today marks 15 years since Apple killed its iSight webcam. It was, in my humble opinion, one of the most beautiful products Apple has ever designed. Even among such illustrious company as the iPhone and the MacBook, this little webcam stood out.

Not long after the iSight was launched in 2003, Apple started building webcams into its Macs, which effectively sounded the death knell for iSight so soon after its introduction. Yet look around today, and there’s nothing remotely as well-designed in the webcam world. It was a product of its time -- and I know it’s never coming back -- but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t mourn its demise.

Read more
Apple almost rejected Google for this key Safari feature
A MacBook with Google Chrome loaded.

As part of an ongoing antitrust trial against Google, Apple has been defending its decision to make Google the default search engine in its Safari web browser. Now, a fascinating tidbit has just emerged: Safari could have been way better at protecting your privacy than it actually is.

In transcripts from the court hearing, it has been revealed that Apple considered making DuckDuckGo the default search engine in Safari’s private browsing mode while keeping Google as the mainstay everywhere else. Despite holding 20 meetings with DuckDuckGo’s executives between 2018 and 2019, Apple ultimately decided against the move.

Read more