Skip to main content

Google kicks out Chrome extensions after code changes bring unwanted ads

google removes chrome extensions cookies adid
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Weeks after changing its terms of service in an effort to force Chrome extension developers to keep their software “simple and single-purpose in nature”, Google has kicked out two from its Web store after violating the new rules.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the offending browser extensions – Add to Feedly and Tweet This Page – began to serve up ads after they were silently updated with adware code.

Recommended Videos

The Journal said that the new code, which injected ads onto pages where they wouldn’t usually appear, was introduced to the two extensions after the owners sold their work on to other developers who then introduced the monetization features to the software.

After the extensions started to serve up unwanted ads, their five-star ratings in the Chrome store quickly dropped to just one, with many users jumping onto message boards to air their grievances.

The move by Google over the weekend to remove the software from its store has shone a light on the practice of buying and selling extensions and their related data, and is a reminder of  how Chrome extensions are automatically updated in the background without the user knowing. In contrast, Firefox allows users of its add-ons to choose between manually checking for updates or having them installed automatically. 

‘A bad  decision’

Add To Feedly‘s developer Amit Agarwal said in a recent blog post that selling his extension was “a bad decision.”

A month after making the four-figure sale, the new owner pushed an update to the Chrome store that “didn’t bring any new features to the table nor contained any bug fixes. Instead, they incorporated advertising into the extension,” Agarwal said.

“These aren’t regular banner ads that you see on web pages, these are invisible ads that work the background and replace links on every website that you visit into affiliate links.”

He continued, “The business model of the buyer is simple – they buy popular add-ons, inject affiliate links and the bulk of users would never notice this since the Chrome browser automatically updates add-ons in the background. And there are no changelogs either.”

A member of the developer team for a Chrome extension called Honey, which has around 270,000 users, revealed on Reddit recently that several offers have also come its way in the past year.

“We’ve been approached by malware companies that have tried to buy the extension, data collection companies that have tried to buy user data, and adware companies that have tried to partner with us,” Honey’s developer said, adding, “We turned them all down.”

While the best browser extensions can help to personalize your Web experience and introduce a ton of new functionality, it’s clear that if they fall into the wrong hands somewhere down the line, they can quickly become a lost cause for many users. If the practice of new owners introducing unwanted functionality causes increasing problems, Google may consider offering users the option to turn off automatic updates, or at the least, notifying them when an extension changes hands.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
This new Google Chrome security warning is very important
The Google Chrome logo on a black phone which is resting on a red book

Google is changing how it warns its users about suspicious files on Chrome by adding new full-page warnings and cloud scanning regarding suspicious downloads, according to Windows Report. This is an attempt to explain more precisely why it blocks specific downloads. Google says that the AI models will divide the warning into two categories: "suspicious" or "dangerous."

The new warning system primarily benefits those using the anti-phishing Enhanced protection feature. The files users upload to the cloud for an automatic scan and those that undergo a deep scan are 50 times more likely to have the AI flag them as malware.

Read more
Google just gave up on its proposed makeover of the internet
Google Chrome browser running on Android Automotive in a car.

Google announced on Monday that it will pull the brakes on phasing out the use of third-party cookies on its Chrome browser because of concerns from regulators, competitors, and privacy advocates, the tech giant said in a Privacy Sandbox post. Instead, Google will be going in a different direction that will let users choose how they interact with third-party cookies.

Blocking third-party cookies would have presented a hurdle for remarketing, which lets companies serve you ads based on your previous activity around the web.

Read more
Why even Chrome devotees should give the Arc web browser a shot
The Arc web browser running on macOS Ventura, showing an Easel with live snippets listing temperatures in New York and flights there from London.

Google Chrome is one of the best browsers you can get, and its popularity among internet users is absolutely unrivaled. But there’s a new kid on the block called Arc that aims to steal some of Google’s thunder.

We’ve written about it before, and Arc is an intriguing web browser for a whole host of reasons. But should you ditch Chrome for Arc? That’s what we’re hoping to answer in this guide. Here, we’ve compared the two browsers across a range of metrics, from design and features to performance and security. If you’re not sure which browser is best for you, read on to find out.
Design
Arc features a Split View mode that lets you view multiple tabs side-by-side. Alex Blake / Digital Trends

Read more