Skip to main content

Google Spurns DOJ Search Data Subpoena

Search giant Google has refused to comply with a White House subpoena demanding one week’s worth of search engine strings submitted to the Google search engine, even though the government isn’t asking for any additional information which could be used to identify Google users, although it also wants a list of 1 million random Web addresses included in Google’s search index.

The subpoena was first issued in the summer of 2005 as part of the federal government’s effort to restore 1998’s Child Online Protection Act (COPA). The COPA statute criminalizes posting free online material deemed “harmful to minors,” providing penalties of up to $50,000 per day and six months in prison.COPA was immediately challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and others, and the case now awaits trial after having twice been sent back to lower courts by the U.S. Supreme Court. The ACLU and others argue COPA violates First Amendment free speech rights, and non-legislative solutions (such as filtering and kids-safe service) offer effective ways to protect children online without resorting to authoritarian measures.

Recommended Videos

The Department of Justice is seeking data on search engine usage to prepare part of its defense of COPA, and claims it needs the search data to understand Web user behavior and estimate how often typical Web users encounter material which would be considered harmful to minors. It also sought similar data from Yahoo, Microsoft, and AOL: Yahoo and AOL report they have complied, and the ACLU reports that Microsoft also complied. The Department of Justice and Google have been negotiating for some time, resulting in the DOJ substantially reducing the amount of information it was requesting from Google; it’s not known at this time whether other search engines complied with the original DOJ request or negotiated their own disclosures.

Google counters that it is not party to the COPA case before the courts and the subpoena is overly broad. Privacy advocates note many search strings themselves often contain personally identifiable information such as addresses and names, and that the government is effectively demanding Google perform as its research lab, subpoenaing data for research into a case with which it has no involvement rather than subpoenaing evidence.

The Department of Justice has asked a San Jose judge to order Google to comply with its subpoena.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Recuva vs. DMDE: Which is the best free data recovery software for you?
Recuva and DMDE pricing appears in a split-screen on a PC monitor.

I've reviewed the best data recovery software you can buy, which often require a costly subscription. However, there are some very good free apps that can help restore your missing files or photos.

CCleaner's Recuva and DMDE are among the best free data recovery apps that let you preview and restore a wide variety of files at no cost. I'll focus on the free versions, but also cover the more powerful paid apps.
Specs

Read more
Google’s new Gemini 2.0 AI model is about to be everywhere
Gemini 2.0 logo

Less than a year after debuting Gemini 1.5, Google's DeepMind division was back Wednesday to reveal the AI's next-generation model, Gemini 2.0. The new model offers native image and audio output, and "will enable us to build new AI agents that bring us closer to our vision of a universal assistant," the company wrote in its announcement blog post.

As of Wednesday, Gemini 2.0 is available at all subscription tiers, including free. As Google's new flagship AI model, you can expect to see it begin powering AI features across the company's ecosystem in the coming months. As with OpenAI's o1 model, the initial release of Gemini 2.0 is not the company's full-fledged version, but rather a smaller, less capable "experimental preview" iteration that will be upgraded in Google Gemini in the coming months.

Read more
This cybersecurity disaster made Google’s top 10 searches of 2024
The blue screen of death in Windows.

Google recently released its Year in Search 2024, with a wide range of different topics reaching the top 10. Among major events like the Olympics and the U.S. presidential election is one name you may have forgotten about, but will remember for the chaos it caused. I'm talking, of course, about CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm founded in 2011 in Austin, Texas — the same one that was (at least partially) responsible for the largest IT outage ever.

So, what did CrowdStrike do exactly to earn its spot on the list? In a nutshell, it's responsible for the faulty code that meddled with core functions on the affected Windows computers. The error displayed messages on users' PCs saying: "Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart." The result was downed PCs across the country, affecting a wide range of industries, but most notably, airports. From an IT perspective, this was a nightmare scenario.

Read more