Skip to main content

What's a Vive? Consumer interest swings wildly in favor of HoloLens, according to search report

hololens was more popular than oculus rift in 2015 but that trend may not hold up 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
With all of the press the likes of the Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and Gear VR received in 2015, you would be forgiven for thinking one (probably the former) was the headset with the most public interest. But you’d be wrong. Despite a much higher price tag, lower field of view, and a much longer development cycle ahead of it, the HoloLens was the most searched for in 2015.

People went further than just Googling it. The HoloLens portion of Microsoft’s website was visited 50 million times throughout 2015, according to market intelligence firm SimilarWeb. In comparison, Oculus VR’s site was only hit 30 million times – though that might have changed substantially in the weeks after the opening of pre-orders.

Recommended Videos

The HTC Vive’s website had just 70,000 visits arrive from search engines, far behind even PlayStation VR’s 540,000.

HoloLens did have its biggest interest spike right after CES 2015, where it was unveiled for the first time. By November 2015 much interest had waned, with ‘only’ three quarters of a million visitors going to the site during that month.

Moving forward, SimilarWeb said that it sees Oculus winning the early VR/AR game, despite HoloLens’ popularity, but that other factors like content and even adult entertainment may play a large part in what becomes the most dominant platform.

Unlike the aforementioned virtual reality headsets, HoloLens is a little like Google Glass, as it uses ‘augmented” reality to overlay virtual elements in the real world. Microsoft has demonstrated this being used in creative ways. Architectures might use the device to obtain X-Ray vision, viewing the interiors of walls and ceilings with the use of blueprint data. Or if you’re more interested in leisure, HoloLens could turn your living room into a battleground.

In reality, it’s not quite as capable as that just yet. When our own Matt Smith tested the Hololens last year, he said it had a restricted field of view, and that the image quality still needed to be improved. The concept is excellent, but Microsoft’s device is much further from production than VR headsets from Oculus and HTC.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more