Skip to main content

IBM acquires data analytics company, Netezza, for $1.7 billion

IBM has agreed to acquire data specialist Netezza Corp. for $1.78 billion, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

The acquisition marks IBM’s expansion into the analytics business. IBM said it has invested more than $12 billion in its analytics business in the past four years, and employs 6,000 analytics consultants. IBM said the deal will boost its analytics business, which helps companies reduce the time and cost of analyzing business information. This follows a string of acquisitions that have been made around data analytics over the past couple years.

Recommended Videos

IBM said in an official statement, “Netezza strongly complements our business analytics capabilities and client base.  Together, we have the opportunity to quickly leverage the technology and accelerate the offering.”

IBM and Netezza have worked together for years, building systems that analyze large quantities of data for customers such as Amazon.com and a variety of government agencies. Globally, Netezza has more than 350 clients; the company has about 500 employees.

Netezza has benefited from trends such as the rapidly growing volume of data, the increasing strategic importance of data analysis and the tighter integration between data warehousing and transactional systems.

Netezza holders will receive $27 a share under the deal, a 9.8-percent premium to Friday’s closing price.

The deal, expected to close in the fourth quarter, comes as Netezza’s stock has more than doubled this year and has jumped from $15 at the end of August amid the 3PAR bidding war. The $1.78 billion price excludes cash on Netezza’s books.

Laura Khalil
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Laura is a tech reporter for Digital Trends, the editor of Dorkbyte and a science blogger for PBS. She's been named one of…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more