Skip to main content

ICANN Rejects .xxx, Approves .tel

In a controversial move, The Internet Corporation for Assigned Named and Numbers (ICANN) has voted against the creation of a top-level “.xxx” domain for adult Web sites, creating a sort of online “red-light district” for adult materials. Opponents argued such a domain would represent a threat to children and a legitimatization of obscene content; proponents argued a “.xxx” domain would more easily enable filtering of objectionable material.

The decision reverses a preliminary approval of a “.xxx” top-level domain in June of 2005; however, at that time ICANN postponed a final decision in August 2005 owing to pressure from the U.S. government, leading many critics to question ICANN’s independence. While ICANN ostensibly governs the Internet, ultimate veto power on its decisions rests with the U.S. Commerce Department.

Recommended Videos

In its explanation of the rejection, ICANN executive Paul Twomey said the decision was not based on politics, but rather sought to avoid setting up ICANN as an arbiter of often contradicting speech-related laws in many countries. Speech banned in some nations is protected in others; similarly, definitions of obscenity and material deemed harmful to minors vary widely by nationality and jurisdiction.

The EU’s European Commission says the rejection of a “.xxx” domain clearly demonstrated U.S. government interference in ICANN processes, and amounted to little more than the United States attempting to impose its values on the rest of the world.

Although ICANN doesn’t yet make mention on their site or meeting minutes, the Associated Press is reporting ICANN also approved the “.tel” top-level domain. Although the .tel domain doesn’t seem to have generated a lot of opposition, it also doesn’t seem to have much interest: the domain would exist mainly to synchronize phone, email, and Web site information for individuals and companies.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more