Skip to main content

Intel’s Arc Alchemist GPU should have Nvidia and AMD worried

Intel finally lifted the curtain on its discrete Arc Alchemist graphics cards in a special livestream on Wednesday. The first cards showing up are specifically for laptops, and they’re from the lowest class of GPUs Intel is offering. From what little we know right now, though, they should have Nvidia and AMD worried.

Before getting to performance, let’s look at the Arc Alchemist mobile range.

A chart shows specs for Intel Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards.
Intel

As was anticipated based on rumors about Arc Alchemist, Intel is leading the launch with its Arc 3-class GPUs. There are two models here, both targeting thin and light laptops that need a discrete graphics card. Intel highlighted the Samsung Galaxy Book 2 as one of the first models available (it was unintentionally shown off ahead of the announcement).

Recommended Videos

Moving up the range, there’s the Arc 5 and Arc 7, which will arrive in early summer. The flagship A770M chip could be targeting Nvidia’s RTX 3080 Ti mobile. Both come with 16GB of memory and a 256-bit bus, which hints at how high Intel’s range may go. Intel hasn’t made that comparison, however.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Intel says Arc 3 GPUs are competing with cards like the RX 6500M and RTX 3050. In practice, that means gaming at 1080p with medium settings, targeting at least 60 frames per second (fps). Intel’s first-party benchmarks show that 60 fps at 1080p is possible with Arc 3 GPUs.

A chart shows benchmarks for Intel Arc Alchemist graphics cards.
Intel

We always recommend waiting for third-party benchmarks before drawing any conclusions about performance. Intel’s tests are enticing, though, showing respectable performance in even demanding titles like Hitman 3 and Doom Eternal. 

Compared to Nvidia’s mobile offerings, Intel is taking an interesting approach with Arc Alchemist. Nvidia allows laptop designers a range of power limits for its graphics cards, which makes a huge difference in performance. That’s why the RTX 3080 Ti in the Gigabyte Aero 16 doesn’t perform as well as the one in the MSI Raider GE76. Intel is offering a range as well, but the company clarified that the listed specs are for the lowest graphics power possible. That means most cards should run faster than Intel’s listed specs.

Like the desktop range, all Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards support hardware ray tracing, variable rate shading, and Intel’s XeSS upsampling technology. XeSS isn’t coming at launch, however; despite revealing new games that will support the feature, like Ghostwire Tokyo and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Intel said the feature won’t arrive until early summer.

Along with the graphics cards themselves, Intel announced more details about the software supporting them. Intel Arc Control is a one-stop shop for drivers, tuning, and game settings, according to Intel. It functions as an overlay, similar to Nvidia GeForce Experience. Unlike GeForce Experience, however, Arc Control doesn’t require users to log in.

It’s mainly a vessel for drivers, but Intel said Arc Control will also show performance data about your system and provide tools for streamers. You can stream directly from the software and use A.I.-enhanced camera features like background blur, background replacement, and auto framing. Intel also said users can adjust performance here with desktop graphics cards, suggesting that there will be controls for overclocking.

The first Intel Arc Alchemist laptops are available to purchase today, and Intel says several more models will release before the other cards arrive this summer.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
5 CPUs you should buy instead of the Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K socketed into a motherboard.

The Core Ultra 9 285K arrived with a thud. It's an interesting, and sometimes very impressive, processor, but it's not necessarily a good one. Stacked up against some of the best processors, the Core Ultra 9 285K struggles in gaming and even falls behind in critical productivity apps, which isn't a great start for Intel's latest generation.

Thankfully, there are some excellent alternatives. I've reviewed just about every CPU that Intel and AMD have released in the past several generations, and I've rounded up five processors that match, and often beat, the Core Ultra 9 285K -- sometimes even for a lower price.
Core i9-14900K

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: which makes the best CPUs?
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

When it comes to desktop and laptop processors, the two biggest names in town are Intel and AMD. Qualcomm is making inroads, but if you want peak performance, Intel and AMD make the best processors for gaming and serious productivity.

Still, it's not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans. AMD's most recent Ryzen 9000 CPUs were met with a lukewarm reception, but then Intel's Core Ultra 200-series were even less impressive. It may be up to X3D CPUs and turbo modes to save the day.

Read more
AMD could swipe some of the best features of Nvidia GPUs
AMD logo on the RX 7800 XT graphics card.

Nvidia overwhelmingly dominates the list of the best graphics cards, and that largely comes down to its feature set that's been enabled through DLSS. AMD isn't sitting idly by, however. The company is researching new ways to leverage neural networks to enable real-time path tracing on AMD graphics cards -- something that, up to this point, has only really been possible on Nvidia GPUs.

AMD addressed the research in a blog post on GPUOpen, saying that the goal is "moving towards real-time path tracing on RDNA GPUs." Nvidia already uses AI accelerators on RTX graphics cards to upscale an image via DLSS, but AMD is focused on a slightly different angle of performance gains -- denoising.

Read more