Skip to main content

Intel might get slapped with a class-action lawsuit

Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The calls for a class-action lawsuit in response to Intel’s instability issues with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs are turning into action. The law firm of Abington Cole + Ellery has launched an investigation into a potential class-action lawsuit against Intel, and it has a form on its website for users to submit details if they believe they’re an affected party.

The law firm hasn’t provided any details on what the class action might entail, but the form asks customers if they’ve purchased an affected processor or a PC containing one of the affected processors, as well as if they’ve experienced issues. About a day after posting, the form is currently sitting on top of the r/Intel subreddit, right above a megathread where Intel users can report if they’ve experienced any instability issues. A user claiming to be a class-action lawyer asked if Intel is honoring return requests, and most responses claim the company is.

Abington Cole and Ellery specializes in class action and intellectual property law, and the firm won a settlement against T-Mobile in 2021 related to a data breach. The law firm has launched dozens of investigations in the past, mostly related to data breaches.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

As we learned when speaking to users impacted by the instability of Intel’s 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, the problem is widespread. We’ve also heard sparse reports that Intel has denied return requests in some cases, which could play a critical role if this class-action lawsuit gets off the ground.

We’ve sent Intel a list of questions about its instability problem and have yet to receive answers to all of our concerns. The company has said it will fully support customers impacted by a manufacturing error in the exchange process, but it hasn’t committed to refunding users impacted by instability issues. It also has said it won’t recall the CPUs. In addition, Intel hasn’t commented on if it will honor returns on processors that are permanently damaged.

Although we don’t know exactly what’s going on with Intel’s CPUs, we have a lot of clues. Intel itself says that the problem could affect a wide range of CPUs. “Intel Core 13th and 14th Generation desktop processors with 65W or higher base power – including K/KF/KS and 65W non-K variants – could be affected by the elevated voltages issue. However, this does not mean the listed desktop processors are inevitably impacted by the issue,” Intel told Digital Trends.

Intel believes the source of the problem comes down to the microcode in the CPUs requesting too high of a voltage. The company says it will deliver a microcode update in mid-August. Although that could address some of the issues with Intel’s current batch of CPUs, the company describes the update as a “preventative measure” and hasn’t said if it will fix instability issues on CPUs that have already degraded.

It’s hard to know the scale of the issue, but Level1Techs estimates that the number of impacted chips could be as high as 50% of all 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs in circulation. Elevated operating voltages can cause a CPU to degrade rapidly. With millions of CPUs degrading at different rates, it’s hard to pin down exactly how widespread the issue is. If you have a 13th-gen or 14th-gen CPU, we recommend running through Robeytech’s benchmark process to see if your CPU crashes.

Although the situation with Intel’s CPUs is only heating up, it’s important to understand that this isn’t a lawsuit yet. This is an investigation into a potential class-action lawsuit. If it gets off the ground, we’ll keep you updated.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
It’s official: AMD beats Intel in gaming laptops
Two Zephyrus G16 laptops sitting next to each other.

We are constantly making comparisons between AMD and Intel when reviewing some of the best gaming laptops on the market. Just like desktops, we're trying to find which company makes the best processor you can buy. It's never a perfect comparison, though. Differences between the thermal design and build quality of laptops make it next to impossible to truly get a one-to-one comparison. Now, we finally have the chance for that comparison.

Asus sent out its new ROG Zephyrus G16 equipped with one of AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs, giving us a chance to compare it to the Intel-based ROG Zephyrus G16 we reviewed earlier this year. I didn't expect a big difference in performance given that these two laptops are basically identical. Boy, was I wrong.
A rare opportunity

Read more
I tested the Ryzen 9 9950X against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and I was shocked by the results
The Ryzen 9 9950X socketed in a motherboard.

If we're going strictly by the numbers, the Ryzen 9 9950X is the best processor you can buy. It tops performance charts almost across the board, as you can read in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review. In practice, the CPU isn't as impressive as it could be. Not only does it arrive much more expensive than the competition but AMD is competing with itself when it comes to CPUs like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

I expected the Ryzen 7 7800X3D to continue to stay relevant in this new era of Zen 5 CPUs. I didn't, however, expect it to be a flat-out better choice for those looking for the best gaming processor. Although the Ryzen 9 9950X can top productivity charts, AMD's last-gen gaming monster remains the performance king when you're chasing frames.
Specs

Read more
I tested AMD’s latest claims about Ryzen 9000, and they don’t hold up
The Ryzen 9 9950X between someone's fingertips.

AMD says that gaming performance on Ryzen 9000 is actually better than what you've read. As you can read in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review, AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs are the best processors you can buy when it comes to productivity. Gaming performance, on the other hand, is disappointing.

According to a new blog post from AMD, there are a few reasons why reviewers saw lower gaming performance than expected. Chief among them are the fact that AMD used an unreleased version of Windows 11 -- the 24H2 update, which is available to Windows Insiders -- and that it used an administrator account for its "automated test methodology." In light of that, I downloaded the Windows update, spun up an admin account, and retested the Ryzen 9 9950X. And I'm not seeing what AMD claims at all.

Read more